[PATCH 1/3] headers: Sync {amdgpu,radeon}_drm.h with the kernel
Andres Rodriguez
andresx7 at gmail.com
Mon Jan 9 18:07:05 UTC 2017
On 2017-01-09 01:00 PM, Deucher, Alexander wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: amd-gfx [mailto:amd-gfx-bounces at lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf
>> Of Andres Rodriguez
>> Sent: Monday, January 09, 2017 12:01 PM
>> To: Emil Velikov
>> Cc: amd-gfx mailing list
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] headers: Sync {amdgpu,radeon}_drm.h with the
>> kernel
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2017-01-09 11:23 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
>>> Thank you Andres. There's a small nit below.
>>>
>>> On 5 January 2017 at 00:29, Andres Rodriguez <andresx7 at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>> Generated using make headers_install from:
>>>> airlied/drm-next 2cf026a Merge branch 'linux-4.10' ...
>>>>
>>>> Manually re-added missing RADEON_TILING_R600_NO_SCANOUT as
>> documented on
>>>> README
>>>>
>>> "Thou Shalt Not make any manual changes to include/drm/*h"
>>>
>>> Please check if there's released open-source userspace which depends
>>> on this. If there's none just drop it all together, alternatively
>>> please update the kernel header(s).
>> Gallium in mesa depends on this, so I'll update the kernel headers
>> accordingly.
> IIRC, these are not required for the ioctls, they were just put in here since the header is shared between multiple userspace components.
>
> Alex
Would it still be okay to add it to the kernel side then? Having
multiple userspace components depend on it would make it complicated to
get a patch merged into each of them.
Andres
>> Thanks again for pointing me to the README, it was pretty useful.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Andres
>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Emil
>> _______________________________________________
>> amd-gfx mailing list
>> amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
More information about the amd-gfx
mailing list