[PATCH 0/5] amdgpu: Visible VRAM Management Improvements, next take

[John Brooks]

On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 05:29:38PM +0900, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On 08/07/17 07:50 AM, John Brooks wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 06, 2017 at 07:51:25PM +0900, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> >> From: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer at amd.com>
> >>
> >> This is a rearrangement of some patches of John's, with some improvements
> >> of mine, and a patch of mine, rebased on current amd-staging-4.11.
> >> Details about changes in the individual patches.
> >>
> >> John Brooks (4):
> >>   drm/amdgpu: Add vis_vramlimit module parameter
> >>   drm/amdgpu: Throttle visible VRAM moves separately
> >>   drm/amdgpu: Set/clear CPU_ACCESS flag on page fault and move to VRAM
> >>   drm/amdgpu: Don't force BOs into visible VRAM for page faults
> >>
> >> Michel Dänzer (1):
> >>   drm/amdgpu: Try evicting from CPU visible to invisible VRAM first
> >>
> >>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h        |  7 ++-
> >>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c     | 92 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> >>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_drv.c    |  4 ++
> >>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c | 49 +++++++++-------
> >>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c    | 45 +++++++++++++++
> >>  5 files changed, 157 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
> > 
> > I tested these changes against drm-next-4.13. Looks good to me.
> 
> Thanks for testing, pushed to the internal amd-staging-4.11 branch.
> 

Awesome :)

> 
> Also thanks for the R-b tag offers, but I think it's a bit weird to add
> those from the author of a patch. :)
> 

Indeed. I only wasn't sure since changes had been made on top of mine.

Thanks :)
John

> 
> -- 
> Earthling Michel Dänzer               |               http://www.amd.com
> Libre software enthusiast             |             Mesa and X developer
>