[PATCH 5/8] drm/amdgpu: According hardware design revert vce and uvd doorbell assignment
Alex Deucher
alexdeucher at gmail.com
Tue Jul 25 15:59:43 UTC 2017
On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 5:17 AM, Xiangliang.Yu <Xiangliang.Yu at amd.com> wrote:
> From: Frank Min <Frank.Min at amd.com>
>
> Now uvd doorbell is from 0xf8-0xfb and vce doorbell is from 0xfc-0xff
>
> Signed-off-by: Frank Min <Frank.Min at amd.com>
> Signed-off-by: Xiangliang.Yu <Xiangliang.Yu at amd.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h | 18 +++++++++---------
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/uvd_v7_0.c | 6 ++++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/vce_v4_0.c | 6 +++---
> 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h
> index fe96236..d287621 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h
> @@ -680,15 +680,15 @@ typedef enum _AMDGPU_DOORBELL64_ASSIGNMENT
> /* overlap the doorbell assignment with VCN as they are mutually exclusive
> * VCE engine's doorbell is 32 bit and two VCE ring share one QWORD
> */
> - AMDGPU_DOORBELL64_RING0_1 = 0xF8,
> - AMDGPU_DOORBELL64_RING2_3 = 0xF9,
> - AMDGPU_DOORBELL64_RING4_5 = 0xFA,
> - AMDGPU_DOORBELL64_RING6_7 = 0xFB,
> -
> - AMDGPU_DOORBELL64_UVD_RING0_1 = 0xFC,
> - AMDGPU_DOORBELL64_UVD_RING2_3 = 0xFD,
> - AMDGPU_DOORBELL64_UVD_RING4_5 = 0xFE,
> - AMDGPU_DOORBELL64_UVD_RING6_7 = 0xFF,
> + AMDGPU_DOORBELL64_UVD_RING0_1 = 0xF8,
> + AMDGPU_DOORBELL64_UVD_RING2_3 = 0xF9,
> + AMDGPU_DOORBELL64_UVD_RING4_5 = 0xFA,
> + AMDGPU_DOORBELL64_UVD_RING6_7 = 0xFB,
> +
> + AMDGPU_DOORBELL64_VCE_RING0_1 = 0xFC,
> + AMDGPU_DOORBELL64_VCE_RING2_3 = 0xFD,
> + AMDGPU_DOORBELL64_VCE_RING4_5 = 0xFE,
> + AMDGPU_DOORBELL64_VCE_RING6_7 = 0xFF,
>
> AMDGPU_DOORBELL64_MAX_ASSIGNMENT = 0xFF,
> AMDGPU_DOORBELL64_INVALID = 0xFFFF
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/uvd_v7_0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/uvd_v7_0.c
> index ab447e8..590c3f0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/uvd_v7_0.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/uvd_v7_0.c
> @@ -435,13 +435,15 @@ static int uvd_v7_0_sw_init(void *handle)
> return r;
> }
>
> -
> for (i = 0; i < adev->uvd.num_enc_rings; ++i) {
> ring = &adev->uvd.ring_enc[i];
> sprintf(ring->name, "uvd_enc%d", i);
> if (amdgpu_sriov_vf(adev)) {
> ring->use_doorbell = true;
> - ring->doorbell_index = AMDGPU_DOORBELL64_UVD_RING0_1 * 2;
> + if (i == 0)
> + ring->doorbell_index = AMDGPU_DOORBELL64_UVD_RING0_1 * 2;
> + else
> + ring->doorbell_index = AMDGPU_DOORBELL64_UVD_RING2_3 * 2 + 1;
Can you clarify the requirements? This logic doesn't seem right.
> }
> r = amdgpu_ring_init(adev, ring, 512, &adev->uvd.irq, 0);
> if (r)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/vce_v4_0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/vce_v4_0.c
> index 9e0050d..34c2281 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/vce_v4_0.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/vce_v4_0.c
> @@ -446,11 +446,11 @@ static int vce_v4_0_sw_init(void *handle)
> /* DOORBELL only works under SRIOV */
> ring->use_doorbell = true;
> if (i == 0)
> - ring->doorbell_index = AMDGPU_DOORBELL64_RING0_1 * 2;
> + ring->doorbell_index = AMDGPU_DOORBELL64_VCE_RING0_1 * 2;
> else if (i == 1)
> - ring->doorbell_index = AMDGPU_DOORBELL64_RING2_3 * 2;
> + ring->doorbell_index = AMDGPU_DOORBELL64_VCE_RING2_3 * 2;
> else
> - ring->doorbell_index = AMDGPU_DOORBELL64_RING2_3 * 2 + 1;
> + ring->doorbell_index = AMDGPU_DOORBELL64_VCE_RING2_3 * 2 + 1;
Same here. The one is even weirder.
Alex
> }
> r = amdgpu_ring_init(adev, ring, 512, &adev->vce.irq, 0);
> if (r)
> --
> 2.7.4
>
> _______________________________________________
> amd-gfx mailing list
> amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
More information about the amd-gfx
mailing list