[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] tests: Rename I915_MAX_PIPES to IGT_MAX_PIPES

[Harry Wentland]

On 2017-06-16 09:10 AM, Arkadiusz Hiler wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 01:56:24PM +0300, Arkadiusz Hiler wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 10:11:36AM -0400, Leo wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2017-06-13 08:55 AM, Arkadiusz Hiler wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 03:41:14PM +0300, Arkadiusz Hiler wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 10:35:34AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, 12 Jun 2017, Harry Wentland <harry.wentland at amd.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> The email was sent but might be stuck in the moderation queue since Leo
>>>>>>> (Sun peng) is fairly new on the FDO mailing lists.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Jani, Daniel, can you check if Leo's IGT emails are stuck in the
>>>>>>> moderation queue?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Done. I've whitelisted his email address on intel-gfx, but I suggest
>>>>>> subscribing too.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> BR,
>>>>>> Jani.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks Jani.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'll wait with pushing this untill we run it though CI system to make
>>>>> sure nothing breaks, as suggested by Petri.
>>>>
>>>> To clarify - this depends on the series that changes the number to six,
>>>> and that's the one that should use some testing.
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for the patch!
>>>>>
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Arek
>>>
>>> Thanks Jani.
>>>
>>> Arek, regarding CI - are there any updates on the test results?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Leo
>>
>> Sorry for the delay, we were preoccupied with other things. The run
>> should happen after the current in-flight one.
>>
>> I'll notify you of the results once we've got them.
>>
>> Thanks for your patience.
> 
> The patch was ran through our CI and does not cause any regression. I'll
> push both in a moment (increasing the number to 6 and rename).
> 

Thanks, Arek.

Harry

> Thanks!
>