[PATCH 0/9] Visible VRAM Management Improvements

Christian König deathsimple at vodafone.de
Sun Jun 25 11:31:45 UTC 2017


Am 24.06.2017 um 20:36 schrieb John Brooks:
> On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 08:07:15PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
>> Am 23.06.2017 um 19:39 schrieb John Brooks:
>>> This patch series is intended to improve performance when limited CPU-visible
>>> VRAM is under pressure.
>>>
>>> Moving BOs into visible VRAM is essentially a housekeeping task. It's faster to
>>> access them in VRAM than GTT, but it isn't a hard requirement for them to be in
>>> VRAM. As such, it is unnecessary to spend valuable time blocking on this in the
>>> page fault handler or during command submission. Doing so translates directly
>>> into a longer frame time (ergo stalls and stuttering).
>> Sorry, but that strongly sounds like you are messing with things you don't
>> fully understand.
>>
>> Blocking in the page fault handler is mandatory to handle the page fault
>> correctly. So that is not something we can change easily.
> I do understand that. Indeed, the page fault handler must block until the
> memory is accessible. But the memory doesn't have to be in visible VRAM to be
> accessible; it could also be in GTT. So, what I meant was that it does not have
> to block for the excessively long time it takes to move BOs into visible VRAM
> when it is already full. It could spend less time blocking by just moving it to
> GTT in that situation. I apologize for the poor wording.

Ah! Yeah that makes more sense, I could have read the source first 
before writing the mail.

Sorry just got goosebumps from the idea that you tried to avoid the 
blocking in the page fault handler :)

Christian.

>
> John
>
>> Regards,
>> Christian.
>>
>>> The problem worsens when attempting to move BOs into visible VRAM when it is
>>> full. This takes much longer than a simple move because other BOs have to be
>>> evicted, which involves finding and then moving potentially hundreds of other
>>> BOs, which is very time consuming. In the case of limited visible VRAM, it's
>>> important to do this sometime to keep the contents of visible VRAM fresh, but
>>> it does not need to be a blocking operation. If visible VRAM is full, the BO
>>> can be read from GTT in the meantime and the BO can be moved to VRAM later.
>>>
>>> Thus, I have made it so that neither the command submission code nor page fault
>>> handler spends time evicting BOs from visible VRAM, and instead this is
>>> deferred to a workqueue function that's queued when CS requests BOs flagged
>>> AMDGPU_GEM_CREATE_CPU_ACCESS_REQUIRED.
>>>
>>> Speaking of CPU_ACCESS_REQUIRED, I've changed the handling of that flag so that
>>> the kernel driver can clear it later even if it was set by userspace. This is
>>> because the userspace graphics library can't know whether the application
>>> really needs it to be CPU_ACCESS_REQUIRED forever. The kernel driver can't know
>>> either, but it does know when page faults occur, and if a BO doesn't appear to
>>> have any page faults when it's moved somewhere inaccessible, the flag can be
>>> removed and it doesn't have to take up space in CPU-visible memory anymore.
>>> This change was based on IRC discussions with Michel.
>>>
>>> Patch 7 fixes a problem with BO moverate throttling that causes visible VRAM
>>> moves to not be throttled if total VRAM isn't full enough.
>>>
>>> I've also added a vis_vramlimit module parameter for debugging purposes. It's
>>> similar to the vramlimit parameter except it limits only visible VRAM.
>>>
>>> I have tested this patch set with the two games I know to be affected by
>>> visible VRAM pressure: DiRT Rally and Dying Light. It practically eliminates
>>> eviction-related stuttering in DiRT Rally as well as very low performance if
>>> visible VRAM is limited to 64MB. It also fixes severely low framerates that
>>> occurred in some areas of Dying Light. All my testing was done with an R9 290
>>> with 4GB of visible VRAM with an Intel i7 4790.
>>>
>>> --
>>> John Brooks (Frogging101)
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> amd-gfx mailing list
>>> amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
>>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
>>



More information about the amd-gfx mailing list