[PATCH libdrm 2/7] amdgpu: update amdgpu_drm.h for Vega10
michel at daenzer.net
Thu Mar 23 08:02:35 UTC 2017
On 22/03/17 07:13 PM, Marek Olšák wrote:
> On Mar 22, 2017 2:44 AM, "Michel Dänzer" <michel at daenzer.net
> <mailto:michel at daenzer.net>> wrote:
>> On 22/03/17 06:46 AM, Marek Olšák wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 10:27 PM, Nicolai Hähnle
>>> <nhaehnle at gmail.com <mailto:nhaehnle at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>> In the past, I was told off for patches that update this file
>>>> without following the procedure described in
>>>> include/drm/README. Tbh, that procedure causes some
>>>> Anyway, it's definitely useful to have the patch out on the
>>>> mailing list in any case.
>>> Yeah, I know the correct process and I plan to ignore it this
>>> time if I don't get too much backlash, because the alternative
>>> (#ifdef/#define/#endif) is probably even worse.
>> FWIW, only AMDGPU_TILING_SET/GET need #undef,
>> AMDGPU_TILING_SWIZZLE_MODE_SHIFT/MASK and AMDGPU_FAMILY_AI can just
>> be #defined directly, that way the preprocessor will warn if the
>> definitions in libdrm and Mesa end up being inconsistent for some
>> The alternative is rushing out a libdrm release and making Mesa
>> require that, right? That doesn't seem obviously better than a
>> handful of temporary redundant defines in Mesa, hardly
>> justification for bypassing the normal process.
> I need a libdrm release because of the 3rd patch. I can't allow Mesa
> to run without that.
Gotcha, thanks for the clarification.
Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.amd.com
Libre software enthusiast | Mesa and X developer
More information about the amd-gfx