[PATCH 3/6] drm/amdgpu:re-write sriov_reinit_early/late

[Christian König]

Am 01.05.2017 um 08:34 schrieb Monk Liu:
> 1,this way we make those routines compatible with the sequence
>    requirment for both Tonga and Vega10
> 2,ignore PSP hw init when doing TDR, because for SR-IOV device
> the ucode won't get lost after VF FLR, so no need to invoke PSP
> doing the ucode reloading again.
>
> Signed-off-by: Monk Liu <Monk.Liu at amd.com>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++------------
>   1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
> index 5161c20..5573792 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
> @@ -1718,19 +1718,27 @@ static int amdgpu_sriov_reinit_early(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
>   {
>   	int i, r;
>   
> -	for (i = 0; i < adev->num_ip_blocks; i++) {
> -		if (!adev->ip_blocks[i].status.valid)
> -			continue;
> -
> -		if (adev->ip_blocks[i].version->type == AMD_IP_BLOCK_TYPE_COMMON ||
> -				adev->ip_blocks[i].version->type == AMD_IP_BLOCK_TYPE_GMC ||
> -				adev->ip_blocks[i].version->type == AMD_IP_BLOCK_TYPE_IH)
> -			r = adev->ip_blocks[i].version->funcs->hw_init(adev);
> +	static enum amd_ip_block_type ip_order[] = {
> +		AMD_IP_BLOCK_TYPE_GMC,
> +		AMD_IP_BLOCK_TYPE_COMMON,
> +		AMD_IP_BLOCK_TYPE_GFXHUB,
> +		AMD_IP_BLOCK_TYPE_MMHUB,
> +		AMD_IP_BLOCK_TYPE_IH,
> +	};
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < sizeof(ip_order)/sizeof(ip_order[0]); i++) {

Please use ARRAY_SIZE for this.

> +		int j;
> +		struct amdgpu_ip_block *block;
> +
> +		for (j = 0; j < adev->num_ip_blocks; j++) {
> +			block = &adev->ip_blocks[j];
> +
> +			if (block->version->type != ip_order[i] ||
> +				!block->status.valid)
> +				continue;
>   
> -		if (r) {
> -			DRM_ERROR("resume of IP block <%s> failed %d\n",
> -				  adev->ip_blocks[i].version->funcs->name, r);
> -			return r;
> +			r = block->version->funcs->hw_init(adev);
> +			DRM_INFO("RE-INIT: %s %s\n", block->version->funcs->name, r?"failed":"successed");
>   		}
>   	}
>   
> @@ -1741,20 +1749,27 @@ static int amdgpu_sriov_reinit_late(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
>   {
>   	int i, r;
>   
> -	for (i = 0; i < adev->num_ip_blocks; i++) {
> -		if (!adev->ip_blocks[i].status.valid)
> -			continue;
> +	static enum amd_ip_block_type ip_order[] = {
> +		AMD_IP_BLOCK_TYPE_SMC,
> +		AMD_IP_BLOCK_TYPE_DCE,
> +		AMD_IP_BLOCK_TYPE_GFX,
> +		AMD_IP_BLOCK_TYPE_SDMA,
> +		AMD_IP_BLOCK_TYPE_VCE,
> +	};
>   
> -		if (adev->ip_blocks[i].version->type == AMD_IP_BLOCK_TYPE_COMMON ||
> -				adev->ip_blocks[i].version->type == AMD_IP_BLOCK_TYPE_GMC ||
> -				adev->ip_blocks[i].version->type == AMD_IP_BLOCK_TYPE_IH )
> -			continue;
> +	for (i = 0; i < sizeof(ip_order)/sizeof(ip_order[0]); i++) {

Dito.

Apart from that it looks a bit like we are changing the order here?

Is that a good idea. Usually the blocks should be initialized in the 
order defined by ip_blocks.

Christian.

> +		int j;
> +		struct amdgpu_ip_block *block;
>   
> -		r = adev->ip_blocks[i].version->funcs->hw_init(adev);
> -		if (r) {
> -			DRM_ERROR("resume of IP block <%s> failed %d\n",
> -				  adev->ip_blocks[i].version->funcs->name, r);
> -			return r;
> +		for (j = 0; j < adev->num_ip_blocks; j++) {
> +			block = &adev->ip_blocks[j];
> +
> +			if (block->version->type != ip_order[i] ||
> +				!block->status.valid)
> +				continue;
> +
> +			r = block->version->funcs->hw_init(adev);
> +			DRM_INFO("RE-INIT: %s %s\n", block->version->funcs->name, r?"failed":"successed");
>   		}
>   	}
>