GART write flush error on SI w/ amdgpu
Nicolai Hähnle
nhaehnle at gmail.com
Tue May 9 12:13:40 UTC 2017
Hi all,
I'm seeing some very strange errors on Verde with CPU readback from
GART, and am pretty much out of ideas. Some help would be very much
appreciated.
The error manifests with the
GL45-CTS.gtf32.GL3Tests.packed_pixels.packed_pixels_pbo test on amdgpu,
but *not* on radeon. Here's what the test does:
1. Upload a texture.
2. Read the texture back via a shader that uses shader buffer writes to
write data to a buffer that is allocated in GART.
3. The CPU then reads from the buffer -- and sometimes gets stale data.
This sequence is repeated for many sub-tests. There are some sub-tests
where the CPU reads stale data from the buffer, i.e. the shader writes
simply don't make it to the CPU. The tests vary superficially, e.g. the
first failing test is (almost?) always one where data is written in
16-bit words (but there are succeeding sub-tests with 16-bit writes as
well).
The bug is *not* a timing issue. Adding even a 1sec delay (sleep(1);)
between the fence wait and the return of glMapBuffer does not fix the
problem. The data must be stuck in a cache somewhere.
Since the test runs okay with the radeon module, I tried some changes
based on comparing the IB submit between radeon and amdgpu, and based on
comparing register settings via scans obtained from umr. Some of the
things I've tried:
- Set HDP_MISC_CNTL.FLUSH_INVALIDATE_CACHE to 1 (both radeon and
amdgpu/gfx9 set this)
- Add SURFACE_SYNC packets preceded by setting CP_COHER_CNTL2 to the
vmid (radeon does this)
- Change gfx_v6_0_ring_emit_hdp_invalidate: select ME engine instead of
PFP (which seems more logical, and is done by gfx7+), or remove the
corresponding WRITE_DATA entirely
None of these changes helped.
What *does* help is adding an artificial wait. Specifically, I'm adding
a sequence of
- WRITE_DATA
- CACHE_FLUSH_AND_INV_TS_EVENT (BOTTOM_OF_PIPE_TS has same behavior)
- WAIT_REG_MEM
as can be seen in the attached patch. This works around the problem, but
it makes no sense:
Adding the wait sequence *before* the SURFACE_SYNC in ring_emit_fence
works around the problem. However(!) it does not actually cause the UMD
to wait any longer than before. Without this change, the UMD immediately
sees a signaled user fence (and never uses an ioctl to wait), and with
this change, it *still* sees a signaled user fence.
Also, note that the way I've hacked the change, the wait sequence is
only added for the user fence emit (and I'm using a modified UMD to
ensure that there is enough memory to be used by the added wait sequence).
Adding the wait sequence *after* the SURFACE_SYNC *doesn't* work around
the problem.
So for whatever reason, the added wait sequence *before* the
SURFACE_SYNC encourages some part of the GPU to flush the data from
wherever it's stuck, and that's just really bizarre. There must be
something really simple I'm missing, and any pointers would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Nicolai
--
Lerne, wie die Welt wirklich ist,
Aber vergiss niemals, wie sie sein sollte.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: gfx6_hacks.diff
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 6321 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/amd-gfx/attachments/20170509/07d676d5/attachment.bin>
More information about the amd-gfx
mailing list