[PATCH 0/5] GFX9 KIQ

Liu, Shaoyun Shaoyun.Liu at amd.com
Wed May 24 18:03:45 UTC 2017


HI , Alex 
It turn out to be  a wrong card I used for test . 
With a correct Vega10 card , KIQ and  other compute rings   ring test and  IB test passed.  I also verified KFD can use the  KIQ  to submit the invalidate_tlbs successfully . 

Regards
Shaoyun.liu

-----Original Message-----
From: Deucher, Alexander 
Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2017 7:14 AM
To: Liu, Shaoyun; Alex Deucher; StDenis, Tom
Cc: amd-gfx list
Subject: RE: [PATCH 0/5] GFX9 KIQ

> -----Original Message-----
> From: amd-gfx [mailto:amd-gfx-bounces at lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf 
> Of Liu, Shaoyun
> Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2017 7:38 PM
> To: Alex Deucher; StDenis, Tom
> Cc: amd-gfx list
> Subject: RE: [PATCH 0/5] GFX9 KIQ
> 
> I don't have any test for KCQ ,  but KFD use the  KIQ to 
> invalidate_tlbs ,  I try to add some print message in the code to 
> prove  it go through the new code path , but seems I don't  see any 
> messages I added. I tried pr_info , pr_err and  printk , DRM_ERROR and  
> nothing  works , anything changed in amdgpu side to prevent the  message print ?

Do you see the KIQ and compute ring and IB tests passing?

Alex

> 
> Regards
> shaoyun.liu
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: amd-gfx [mailto:amd-gfx-bounces at lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf 
> Of Alex Deucher
> Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2017 5:31 PM
> To: StDenis, Tom
> Cc: amd-gfx list
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] GFX9 KIQ
> 
> On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 7:11 AM, Tom St Denis <tom.stdenis at amd.com>
> wrote:
> > On 11/05/17 07:33 PM, Tom St Denis wrote:
> >>
> >> On 11/05/17 02:35 PM, Alex Deucher wrote:
> >>>
> >>> These are the laste of the gfx9 KIQ patches that haven't landed yet.
> >>> Can someone with gfx9 capable hw test this (vega10 or raven)?  
> >>> This is needed to enable powergating on gfx9.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>
> >>
> >> If nobody gets to it by morning I'll try it out first thing on my
> >> vega10 though my VBIOS might need updating...
> >
> >
> >
> > They don't apply on top of either 4.9 nor 4.11...
> 
> Odd.  They applied for me (at least to the 4.11 tree I had checked out 
> when I left town).  Attached again just in case.
> 
> Alex
> 
> >
> >
> > Tom
> > _______________________________________________
> > amd-gfx mailing list
> > amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
> _______________________________________________
> amd-gfx mailing list
> amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
> _______________________________________________
> amd-gfx mailing list
> amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx


More information about the amd-gfx mailing list