[PATCH libdrm v3 1/1] amdgpu: move asic id table to a separate file

Emil Velikov emil.l.velikov at gmail.com
Tue May 30 11:01:02 UTC 2017


Hi all,

Pardon for dropping in uninvited. Just some food for thought.

On 29 May 2017 at 22:01, Li, Samuel <Samuel.Li at amd.com> wrote:
> Understood your point. However as discussed internally before, marketing names are there for a lot of reasons; my understanding of the policy is we do not need to touch them as long as there is no error in the names and they are allowed to be public.
>
Samuel,

It seems that most comments put forward by people are going on deaf ears.

While there may be valid arguments behind doing so, do consider the following:
 - Review is always encouraged
Regardless if the information is within or outside of the source code.
 - Marketing can make mistakes or have IT glitches
The inconsistent use of "(TM)" and using a 67C2:00 is something one
wants to double-check with them.
 - Having a separate file so that clients can update/edit it does not help much.
You want to ship the whole driver, in order to have a predictable and
consistent user experience.
 - Adding ~200 loc for ~170 devices entries sounds like a step in the
wrong direction.

In either case, not my call. I might follow-up with some issues in the
code itself ;-)

HTH
Emil


More information about the amd-gfx mailing list