[PATCH 4/7] drm/ttm: user reservation object wrappers
Michel Dänzer
michel at daenzer.net
Fri Nov 10 16:20:35 UTC 2017
On 09/11/17 06:13 PM, Christian König wrote:
> Am 09.11.2017 um 17:50 schrieb Michel Dänzer:
>> On 09/11/17 09:59 AM, Christian König wrote:
>>> Consistently use the reservation object wrappers instead of accessing
>>> the ww_mutex directly.
>>>
>>> Additional to that use the reservation object wrappers directly
>>> instead of
>>> calling __ttm_bo_reserve with fixed parameters.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com>
>> [...]
>>
>>> @@ -1823,7 +1823,9 @@ int ttm_bo_wait_unreserved(struct
>>> ttm_buffer_object *bo)
>>> return -ERESTARTSYS;
>>> if (!ww_mutex_is_locked(&bo->resv->lock))
>>> goto out_unlock;
>>> - ret = __ttm_bo_reserve(bo, true, false, NULL);
>>> + ret = reservation_object_lock_interruptible(bo->resv, NULL);
>>> + if (ret = -EINTR)
>>> + ret = -ERESTARTSYS;
>> Typo in the test, must be
>>
>> if (ret == -EINTR)
>>
>>
>> This bug caused the Xorg process to hang for me when trying to run
>> glxgears, requiring a hard reboot. Did you accidentally send an untested
>> version of this patch?
> Yeah, just stumbled over this as well. I accidentally merged the fix for
> this into a later patch which I didn't send out yet.
>
> Consider it fixed,
Thanks. With that, patches 1-6 are
Reviewed-and-Tested-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer at amd.com>
I sent another comment on patch 7.
--
Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.amd.com
Libre software enthusiast | Mesa and X developer
More information about the amd-gfx
mailing list