[PATCH 56/73] drm/amd/display: Remove dangling planes on dc commit state
Andrey Grodzovsky
Andrey.Grodzovsky at amd.com
Fri Nov 10 19:00:07 UTC 2017
On 11/09/2017 03:05 PM, Harry Wentland wrote:
> From: "Leo (Sunpeng) Li" <sunpeng.li at amd.com>
>
> When disabling pipe splitting, we need to make sure we disable both
> planes used.
>
> This should be done for Linux as well.
>
> Change-Id: I79f5416a55bd26c19ca3cfb346a943d69872a8ce
> Signed-off-by: Leo (Sunpeng) Li <sunpeng.li at amd.com>
> Reviewed-by: Tony Cheng <Tony.Cheng at amd.com>
> Acked-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland at amd.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc.c
> index 56df1304e49c..d70dbc102123 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc.c
> @@ -629,6 +629,39 @@ static bool construct(struct dc *dc,
> return false;
> }
>
> +static void disable_dangling_plane(struct dc *dc, struct dc_state *context)
> +{
> + int i, j;
> + struct dc_state *dangling_context = dc_create_state();
> + struct dc_state *current_ctx;
> +
> + if (dangling_context == NULL)
> + return;
> +
> + dc_resource_state_copy_construct(dc->current_state, dangling_context);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < dc->res_pool->pipe_count; i++) {
> + struct dc_stream_state *old_stream =
> + dc->current_state->res_ctx.pipe_ctx[i].stream;
> + bool should_disable = true;
> +
> + for (j = 0; j < context->stream_count; j++) {
> + if (old_stream == context->streams[j]) {
> + should_disable = false;
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> + if (should_disable && old_stream) {
> + dc_rem_all_planes_for_stream(dc, old_stream, dangling_context);
Why this is not happening in atomic_check during dm_update_planes_state
with enable set to false ? Since the old stream is present
I assume old crtc_state for planes to disable is present and as I see
from the code it should happen in that function
Thanks,
Andrey
> + dc->hwss.apply_ctx_for_surface(dc, old_stream, 0, dangling_context);
> + }
> + }
> +
> + current_ctx = dc->current_state;
> + dc->current_state = dangling_context;
> + dc_release_state(current_ctx);
> +}
> +
> /*******************************************************************************
> * Public functions
> ******************************************************************************/
> @@ -833,14 +866,14 @@ static enum dc_status dc_commit_state_no_check(struct dc *dc, struct dc_state *c
> int i, k, l;
> struct dc_stream_state *dc_streams[MAX_STREAMS] = {0};
>
> + disable_dangling_plane(dc, context);
> +
> for (i = 0; i < context->stream_count; i++)
> dc_streams[i] = context->streams[i];
>
> if (!dcb->funcs->is_accelerated_mode(dcb))
> dc->hwss.enable_accelerated_mode(dc);
>
> -
> -
> for (i = 0; i < context->stream_count; i++) {
> const struct dc_sink *sink = context->streams[i]->sink;
>
> @@ -864,8 +897,6 @@ static enum dc_status dc_commit_state_no_check(struct dc *dc, struct dc_state *c
> }
> }
>
> -
> -
> CONN_MSG_MODE(sink->link, "{%dx%d, %dx%d@%dKhz}",
> context->streams[i]->timing.h_addressable,
> context->streams[i]->timing.v_addressable,
More information about the amd-gfx
mailing list