Operation context for TTM
Dieter Nützel
Dieter at nuetzel-hh.de
Tue Nov 21 02:49:25 UTC 2017
Hello Christian,
your latest 'amd-staging-drm-next' commit
drm/amdgpu: fix VCE buffer placement restrictions v2
#9f896d936c9d4ea936a02d52eaeb14fdd209193b
static int amdgpu_vce_validate_bo(struct amdgpu_cs_parser *p, uint32_t
ib_idx,
int lo, int hi, unsigned size, int32_t index)
[-]
return ttm_bo_validate(&bo->tbo, &bo->placement, false, false);
^^^^^^
'ttm_bo_validate' with 4 than 3 parameter clash.
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vce.c: In function
‘amdgpu_vce_validate_bo’:
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vce.c:590:9: error: too many arguments
to function ‘ttm_bo_validate’
return ttm_bo_validate(&bo->tbo, &bo->placement, false, false);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h:39:0,
from drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vce.c:33:
./include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h:334:5: note: declared here
int ttm_bo_validate(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
New version comming?
Thanks,
Dieter
Am 20.11.2017 05:35, schrieb Dieter Nützel:
> For the series:
>
> Tested-by: Dieter Nützel <Dieter at nuetzel-hh.de>
>
> on RX580
> amd-staging-drm-next 85d09ce5e5039644487e9508d6359f9f4cf64427
>
> with glmark2, DiRT Rally and F1 2017 (radv)
>
> Dieter
>
> Am 17.11.2017 11:49, schrieb Christian König:
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> Michel already reviewed this back in April, but I didn't found time to
>> actually fully test it before now.
>>
>> So sending this one out once more because it's an interface change
>> which affects all driver using TTM.
>>
>> Please review and/or comment.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Christian.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dri-devel mailing list
>> dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
More information about the amd-gfx
mailing list