build failures on drm-next

[Tom St Denis]

I already pushed Rb'ed commits that patch them up :-)

The commits add functionality but they were written before Rex had 
ported smumgr stuff up into hwmgr and when they were merged nobody 
compile tested them.

So reverting is probably not the best idea.

On 02/10/17 10:47 AM, Harry Wentland wrote:
> Does anyone have a strong opinion for or against reverting the offending
> commits?
> 
> Harry
> 
> On 2017-10-02 09:49 AM, Tom St Denis wrote:
>> The lastest good commit is
>>
>> commit f5a16c561fb8a15e94a4384e880b9d84a2657098
>> Author: Colin Ian King <colin.king at canonical.com>
>> Date:   Thu Sep 28 14:46:17 2017 +0100
>>
>>      drm/radeon: make functions alloc_pasid and free_pasid static
>>
>>      The functions alloc_pasid  and free_pasid are local to the
>>      source and do not need to be in global scope, so make them static.
>>
>>      Cleans up sparse warnings:
>>      warning: symbol 'alloc_pasid' was not declared. Should it be static?
>>      warning: symbol 'free_pasid' was not declared. Should it be static?
>>
>>      Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king at canonical.com>
>>      Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher at amd.com>
>>
>>
>> I see errors (e.g., attached) when building from the tip of drm-next.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Tom
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> amd-gfx mailing list
>> amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
>>