[pull] amdgpu drm-fixes-4.14

Alex Deucher alexdeucher at gmail.com
Thu Oct 12 17:49:05 UTC 2017


On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 1:02 PM, Christian König
<ckoenig.leichtzumerken at gmail.com> wrote:
> Am 12.10.2017 um 18:20 schrieb Michel Dänzer:
>>
>> On 12/10/17 05:58 PM, Alex Deucher wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Dave,
>>>
>>> One memory management regression fix.
>>>
>>> The following changes since commit
>>> 545036a9944e9d6e50fed4ca03117147c880ff71:
>>>
>>>    Merge tag 'drm-misc-fixes-2017-10-11' of
>>> git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-misc into drm-fixes (2017-10-12
>>> 10:38:09 +1000)
>>>
>>> are available in the git repository at:
>>>
>>>    git://people.freedesktop.org/~agd5f/linux drm-fixes-4.14
>>>
>>> for you to fetch changes up to 27b94b4f1386c3a8181f5a0277434a32e24e7dd7:
>>>
>>>    drm/amdgpu: fix placement flags in amdgpu_ttm_bind (2017-10-12
>>> 10:34:42 -0400)
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Christian König (1):
>>>        drm/amdgpu: fix placement flags in amdgpu_ttm_bind
>>
>> Thanks Alex, but there's another piglit hang regression in 4.14, caused
>> by commit 6af0883ed977 "drm/amdgpu: discard commands of killed
>> processes", fixed by five commits 6b37d03280a4..318d85de9c20 in
>> amd-staging-drm-next. Either the latter need to be backported to 4.14,
>> or the former needs to be reverted from it.
>
>
> The revert is probably easier to handle at this point.
>
> So to answer your question from the other thread I vote for that.

Nicolai's patches apply cleanly and I think they change about the same
amount of code and we don't have to worry about any problems down the
road when the revert gets merged into drm-next.

Alex


More information about the amd-gfx mailing list