[amd-staging-drm-next] compilation error with latest commit #1b006d838f78

[Harry Wentland]

On 2017-10-17 10:47 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On 13/10/17 09:22 PM, Harry Wentland wrote:
>> On 2017-10-12 08:22 PM, Dieter Nützel wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> next (regression) compilation error:
>>>
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/core/dc_resource.c: In function ‘resource_map_pool_resources’:
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/core/dc_resource.c:1688:14: error: implicit declaration of function ‘acquire_first_split_pipe’; did you mean ‘acquire_first_free_pipe’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>>>    pipe_idx = acquire_first_split_pipe(&context->res_ctx, pool, stream);
>>>               ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>               acquire_first_free_pipe
>>>
>>>
>>> It is wrongly (?) guarded behind:
>>>
>>> #if defined(CONFIG_DRM_AMD_DC_DCN1_0)
>>> static int acquire_first_split_pipe(
>>>                 struct resource_context *res_ctx,
>>>                 const struct resource_pool *pool,
>>>                 struct dc_stream_state *stream)
>>> [snip]
>>>
>>
>> Sent and merged a patch. This function only makes sense for DCN and shouldn't
>> be called otherwise. Thanks for reporting this. I gotta make sure to build
>> without the DCN flag in the future to avoid this.
> 
> Would it be possible to drop options like DRM_AMD_DC_FBC and
> DRM_AMD_DC_DCN1_0 from amd-staging-drm-next (but especially upstream),
> and just always compile the code?

DRM_AMD_DC_FBC should be pretty stable by now and can probably be dropped.
I'll check with Roma who implemented it.

DRM_AMD_DC_DCN1_0 requires X86 because it makes use of floating point code.
We still want to keep that options as users of our driver might need to
use it on PowerPC, ARM, or other platforms.

Harry

> 
>