[PATCH 1/2] dma-buf: keep only not signaled fence in reservation_object_add_shared_replace

[Christian König]

Am 25.10.2017 um 08:42 schrieb Chunming Zhou:
>
>
> On 2017年10月24日 21:55, Christian König wrote:
>> From: Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com>
>>
>> The amdgpu issue to also need signaled fences in the reservation objects
>> should be fixed by now.
>>
>> Optimize the list by keeping only the not signaled yet fences around.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/dma-buf/reservation.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++----------
>>   1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/reservation.c 
>> b/drivers/dma-buf/reservation.c
>> index b44d9d7db347..4ede77d1bb31 100644
>> --- a/drivers/dma-buf/reservation.c
>> +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/reservation.c
>> @@ -145,8 +145,8 @@ reservation_object_add_shared_replace(struct 
>> reservation_object *obj,
>>                         struct reservation_object_list *fobj,
>>                         struct dma_fence *fence)
>>   {
>> -    unsigned i;
>>       struct dma_fence *old_fence = NULL;
>> +    unsigned i, j, k;
>>         dma_fence_get(fence);
>>   @@ -162,9 +162,7 @@ reservation_object_add_shared_replace(struct 
>> reservation_object *obj,
>>        * references from the old struct are carried over to
>>        * the new.
>>        */
>> -    fobj->shared_count = old->shared_count;
>> -
>> -    for (i = 0; i < old->shared_count; ++i) {
>> +    for (i = 0, j = 0, k = old->shared_count; i < old->shared_count; 
>> ++i) {
>>           struct dma_fence *check;
>>             check = rcu_dereference_protected(old->shared[i],
>> @@ -172,10 +170,14 @@ reservation_object_add_shared_replace(struct 
>> reservation_object *obj,
>>             if (!old_fence && check->context == fence->context) {
>>               old_fence = check;
>> -            RCU_INIT_POINTER(fobj->shared[i], fence);
>> -        } else
>> -            RCU_INIT_POINTER(fobj->shared[i], check);
>> +            RCU_INIT_POINTER(fobj->shared[j++], fence);
>> +        } else if (!dma_fence_is_signaled(check)) {
>> +            RCU_INIT_POINTER(fobj->shared[j++], check);
>> +        } else {
>> +            RCU_INIT_POINTER(fobj->shared[--k], check);
>> +        }
>>       }
>> +    fobj->shared_count = j;
>>       if (!old_fence) {
>> RCU_INIT_POINTER(fobj->shared[fobj->shared_count], fence);
> Here there is a memory leak for signaled fence slots, since you 
> re-order the slots, the j'th slot is storing signaled fence, there is 
> no place to put it when you assign to new one.
> you cam move it to end or put it here first.

Good point, thanks. Going to respin.

Regards,
Christian.

>
> Regards,
> David Zhou
>>           fobj->shared_count++;
>> @@ -192,10 +194,19 @@ reservation_object_add_shared_replace(struct 
>> reservation_object *obj,
>>       write_seqcount_end(&obj->seq);
>>       preempt_enable();
>>   -    if (old)
>> -        kfree_rcu(old, rcu);
>> -
>>       dma_fence_put(old_fence);
>> +
>> +    if (!old)
>> +        return;
>> +
>> +    for (i = fobj->shared_count; i < old->shared_count; ++i) {
>> +        struct dma_fence *f;
>> +
>> +        f = rcu_dereference_protected(fobj->shared[i],
>> +                          reservation_object_held(obj));
>> +        dma_fence_put(f);
>> +    }
>> +    kfree_rcu(old, rcu);
>>   }
>>     /**
>