[PATCH 4/4] drm/amd/amdgpu: Cleanup gmc_v9_0_suspend()

Tom St Denis tom.stdenis at amd.com
Fri Sep 1 13:57:11 UTC 2017


Even though fini returns 0 always it could theoretically
fail in the future.  Might as well return it instead of 0.

Signed-off-by: Tom St Denis <tom.stdenis at amd.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c | 4 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c
index 0766dad1fafe..7ca9cbec3004 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c
@@ -795,9 +795,7 @@ static int gmc_v9_0_suspend(void *handle)
 {
 	struct amdgpu_device *adev = (struct amdgpu_device *)handle;
 
-	gmc_v9_0_hw_fini(adev);
-
-	return 0;
+	return gmc_v9_0_hw_fini(adev);
 }
 
 static int gmc_v9_0_resume(void *handle)
-- 
2.12.0



More information about the amd-gfx mailing list