[PATCH 4/4] drm/amd/amdgpu: Cleanup gmc_v9_0_suspend()
Tom St Denis
tom.stdenis at amd.com
Fri Sep 1 13:57:11 UTC 2017
Even though fini returns 0 always it could theoretically
fail in the future. Might as well return it instead of 0.
Signed-off-by: Tom St Denis <tom.stdenis at amd.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c
index 0766dad1fafe..7ca9cbec3004 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c
@@ -795,9 +795,7 @@ static int gmc_v9_0_suspend(void *handle)
{
struct amdgpu_device *adev = (struct amdgpu_device *)handle;
- gmc_v9_0_hw_fini(adev);
-
- return 0;
+ return gmc_v9_0_hw_fini(adev);
}
static int gmc_v9_0_resume(void *handle)
--
2.12.0
More information about the amd-gfx
mailing list