[PATCH 5/8] drm/amdkfd: Use PASID manager from KGD
Oded Gabbay
oded.gabbay at gmail.com
Sun Sep 3 11:54:03 UTC 2017
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 1:25 AM, Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling at amd.com> wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling at amd.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_module.c | 6 ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_pasid.c | 90 ++++++++++++++-------------------
> 2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_module.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_module.c
> index 0d73bea..6c5a9ca 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_module.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_module.c
> @@ -103,10 +103,6 @@ static int __init kfd_module_init(void)
> return -1;
> }
>
> - err = kfd_pasid_init();
> - if (err < 0)
> - return err;
> -
> err = kfd_chardev_init();
> if (err < 0)
> goto err_ioctl;
> @@ -126,7 +122,6 @@ static int __init kfd_module_init(void)
> err_topology:
> kfd_chardev_exit();
> err_ioctl:
> - kfd_pasid_exit();
> return err;
> }
>
> @@ -137,7 +132,6 @@ static void __exit kfd_module_exit(void)
> kfd_process_destroy_wq();
> kfd_topology_shutdown();
> kfd_chardev_exit();
> - kfd_pasid_exit();
> dev_info(kfd_device, "Removed module\n");
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_pasid.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_pasid.c
> index 1e06de0..d6a7961 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_pasid.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_pasid.c
> @@ -20,78 +20,64 @@
> * OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE.
> */
>
> -#include <linux/slab.h>
> #include <linux/types.h>
> #include "kfd_priv.h"
>
> -static unsigned long *pasid_bitmap;
> -static unsigned int pasid_limit;
> -static DEFINE_MUTEX(pasid_mutex);
> -
> -int kfd_pasid_init(void)
> -{
> - pasid_limit = KFD_MAX_NUM_OF_PROCESSES;
> -
> - pasid_bitmap = kcalloc(BITS_TO_LONGS(pasid_limit), sizeof(long),
> - GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!pasid_bitmap)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> -
> - set_bit(0, pasid_bitmap); /* PASID 0 is reserved. */
> -
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> -void kfd_pasid_exit(void)
> -{
> - kfree(pasid_bitmap);
> -}
> +static unsigned int pasid_bits = 16;
> +static const struct kfd2kgd_calls *kfd2kgd;
>
> bool kfd_set_pasid_limit(unsigned int new_limit)
> {
> - if (new_limit < pasid_limit) {
> - bool ok;
> -
> - mutex_lock(&pasid_mutex);
> -
> - /* ensure that no pasids >= new_limit are in-use */
> - ok = (find_next_bit(pasid_bitmap, pasid_limit, new_limit) ==
> - pasid_limit);
> - if (ok)
> - pasid_limit = new_limit;
> -
> - mutex_unlock(&pasid_mutex);
> -
> - return ok;
> + if (new_limit < 2)
> + return false;
> +
> + if (new_limit < (1U << pasid_bits)) {
> + if (kfd2kgd)
> + /* We've already allocated user PASIDs, too late to
> + * change the limit
> + */
> + return false;
> +
> + while (new_limit < (1U << pasid_bits))
> + pasid_bits--;
> }
>
> return true;
> }
>
> -inline unsigned int kfd_get_pasid_limit(void)
> +unsigned int kfd_get_pasid_limit(void)
> {
> - return pasid_limit;
> + return 1U << pasid_bits;
> }
>
> unsigned int kfd_pasid_alloc(void)
> {
> - unsigned int found;
> -
> - mutex_lock(&pasid_mutex);
> -
> - found = find_first_zero_bit(pasid_bitmap, pasid_limit);
> - if (found == pasid_limit)
> - found = 0;
> - else
> - set_bit(found, pasid_bitmap);
> + int r;
> +
> + /* Find the first best KFD device for calling KGD */
> + if (!kfd2kgd) {
> + struct kfd_dev *dev = NULL;
> + unsigned int i = 0;
> +
> + while ((dev = kfd_topology_enum_kfd_devices(i)) != NULL) {
> + if (dev && dev->kfd2kgd) {
> + kfd2kgd = dev->kfd2kgd;
> + break;
> + }
> + i++;
> + }
> +
> + if (!kfd2kgd)
> + return false;
> + }
Don't you need to allocate PASID on all possible devices ?
If so, does it need to be the same on all devices ?
>
> - mutex_unlock(&pasid_mutex);
> + r = kfd2kgd->alloc_pasid(pasid_bits);
>
> - return found;
> + return r > 0 ? r : 0;
> }
>
> void kfd_pasid_free(unsigned int pasid)
> {
> - if (!WARN_ON(pasid == 0 || pasid >= pasid_limit))
> - clear_bit(pasid, pasid_bitmap);
> + if (kfd2kgd)
> + kfd2kgd->free_pasid(pasid);
> }
> --
> 2.7.4
>
> _______________________________________________
> amd-gfx mailing list
> amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
More information about the amd-gfx
mailing list