[PATCH] drm/amd/amdgpu: Fix iova debugfs for non-iommu case
Tom St Denis
tom.stdenis at amd.com
Tue Sep 19 17:20:09 UTC 2017
On 19/09/17 01:18 PM, Christian König wrote:
> Am 19.09.2017 um 19:14 schrieb Tom St Denis:
>> On 19/09/17 01:10 PM, Christian König wrote:
>>> As far as I know we don't need #ifdefs cause there are dummy
>>> functions when IOMMU is not compiled in.
>>>
>>> But this patch is a NAK since it circumvents the /dev/mem restriction
>>> when IOMMU is disabled and that is not something we can easily allow.
>>
>> I raised this objection 24 hours ago and was told to go ahead with the
>> read/write methods anyways.
>>
>> Short of making a list of mappings/allocations in the ttm layer I have
>> no idea how we would track this in the non-iommu case which means the
>> entire iova debugfs entry should have been NAK'ed in the first place.
>>
>> I'm open to suggestions.
>
> As long as IOMMU is enabled the entry is perfectly fine, cause only
> memory mapped to the IOMMU is accessible to the GPU and so accessible
> using the debugfs entry as well.
On devices where there's no translation (e.g. Carrizo) does the iommu
layer track mappings? I'm wondering if on those I could seek outside of
boundaries and read system memory anyways.
> Only when IOMMU is disabled we can't go this way cause we can't know
> which memory is mapped to the driver and which isn't (or could we
> somehow track this?).
>
> I suggest to not create the file in the first place if IOMMU is disabled.
I could easily do this (basically check if the domain is not null at
debugfs init time).
Tom
More information about the amd-gfx
mailing list