[PATCH xf86-video-amdgpu 17/19] Store device_name as AMDGPUEntRec::master_node
michel at daenzer.net
Tue Apr 10 10:01:38 UTC 2018
On 2018-04-10 11:51 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 10 April 2018 at 09:29, Michel Dänzer <michel at daenzer.net> wrote:
>> On 2018-04-04 04:29 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
>>> From: Emil Velikov <emil.velikov at collabora.com>
>>> Rename the variable to reflect what it is. Plus move it out of the dri2
>>> section - it's used in dri2 and dri3.
>>> Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov <emil.velikov at collabora.com>
>>> diff --git a/src/amdgpu_probe.c b/src/amdgpu_probe.c
>>> index 4959bd6..e9afe42 100644
>>> --- a/src/amdgpu_probe.c
>>> +++ b/src/amdgpu_probe.c
>>> @@ -178,6 +178,10 @@ static Bool amdgpu_device_setup(ScrnInfoPtr pScrn,
>>> if (pAMDGPUEnt->fd < 0)
>>> return FALSE;
>>> + pAMDGPUEnt->master_node = drmGetDeviceNameFromFd2(pAMDGPUEnt->fd);
>>> + if (pAMDGPUEnt->master_node)
>>> + goto error_amdgpu;
>> This should be
>> if (!pAMDGPUEnt->master_node)
>> shouldn't it?
>> ... Which raises the question: How did you test these patches? :)
> I mentioned it in the cover letter, but seems to have dropped it -
> they are untested.
> There's a r600 card close-by I could test with, but no amdgpu one :-\
Okay. I can probably test this series, but in general it's preferable
for patches to be tested before sending them out for review.
Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.amd.com
Libre software enthusiast | Mesa and X developer
More information about the amd-gfx