[PATCH] drm/amd/pp: Fix output erroneous clock info on RV
Alex Deucher
alexdeucher at gmail.com
Thu Apr 19 14:07:00 UTC 2018
On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 8:06 AM, Rex Zhu <Rex.Zhu at amd.com> wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Rex Zhu <Rex.Zhu at amd.com>
Please add a proper patch description explaining the change in units
and the switch to using dynamic state rather than hardcoded values.
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_pm.c | 4 +--
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/hwmgr/smu10_hwmgr.c | 42 ++++++++++++-----------
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/hwmgr/smu10_hwmgr.h | 2 --
> 3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_pm.c
> index 8f968bc..435fae9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_pm.c
> @@ -1769,9 +1769,9 @@ static int amdgpu_debugfs_pm_info_pp(struct seq_file *m, struct amdgpu_device *a
> if (!amdgpu_dpm_read_sensor(adev, AMDGPU_PP_SENSOR_GFX_SCLK, (void *)&value, &size))
> seq_printf(m, "\t%u MHz (SCLK)\n", value/100);
> if (!amdgpu_dpm_read_sensor(adev, AMDGPU_PP_SENSOR_STABLE_PSTATE_SCLK, (void *)&value, &size))
> - seq_printf(m, "\t%u MHz (PSTATE_SCLK)\n", value/100);
> + seq_printf(m, "\t%u MHz (PSTATE_SCLK)\n", value);
> if (!amdgpu_dpm_read_sensor(adev, AMDGPU_PP_SENSOR_STABLE_PSTATE_MCLK, (void *)&value, &size))
> - seq_printf(m, "\t%u MHz (PSTATE_MCLK)\n", value/100);
> + seq_printf(m, "\t%u MHz (PSTATE_MCLK)\n", value);
> if (!amdgpu_dpm_read_sensor(adev, AMDGPU_PP_SENSOR_VDDGFX, (void *)&value, &size))
> seq_printf(m, "\t%u mV (VDDGFX)\n", value);
> if (!amdgpu_dpm_read_sensor(adev, AMDGPU_PP_SENSOR_VDDNB, (void *)&value, &size))
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/hwmgr/smu10_hwmgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/hwmgr/smu10_hwmgr.c
> index 0f25226..f7bf5d5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/hwmgr/smu10_hwmgr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/hwmgr/smu10_hwmgr.c
> @@ -340,7 +340,7 @@ static int smu10_get_clock_voltage_dependency_table(struct pp_hwmgr *hwmgr,
>
> static int smu10_populate_clock_table(struct pp_hwmgr *hwmgr)
> {
> - int result;
> + uint32_t result;
>
> struct smu10_hwmgr *smu10_data = (struct smu10_hwmgr *)(hwmgr->backend);
> DpmClocks_t *table = &(smu10_data->clock_table);
> @@ -386,11 +386,11 @@ static int smu10_populate_clock_table(struct pp_hwmgr *hwmgr)
>
> smum_send_msg_to_smc(hwmgr, PPSMC_MSG_GetMinGfxclkFrequency);
> result = smum_get_argument(hwmgr);
> - smu10_data->gfx_min_freq_limit = result * 100;
> + smu10_data->gfx_min_freq_limit = result / 10 * 1000;
>
> smum_send_msg_to_smc(hwmgr, PPSMC_MSG_GetMaxGfxclkFrequency);
> result = smum_get_argument(hwmgr);
> - smu10_data->gfx_max_freq_limit = result * 100;
> + smu10_data->gfx_max_freq_limit = result / 10 * 1000;
>
Are these changes just for rounding reasons?
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -472,6 +472,8 @@ static int smu10_hwmgr_backend_fini(struct pp_hwmgr *hwmgr)
> static int smu10_dpm_force_dpm_level(struct pp_hwmgr *hwmgr,
> enum amd_dpm_forced_level level)
> {
> + struct smu10_hwmgr *data = hwmgr->backend;
> +
> if (hwmgr->smu_version < 0x1E3700) {
> pr_info("smu firmware version too old, can not set dpm level\n");
> return 0;
> @@ -482,7 +484,7 @@ static int smu10_dpm_force_dpm_level(struct pp_hwmgr *hwmgr,
> case AMD_DPM_FORCED_LEVEL_PROFILE_PEAK:
> smum_send_msg_to_smc_with_parameter(hwmgr,
> PPSMC_MSG_SetHardMinGfxClk,
> - SMU10_UMD_PSTATE_PEAK_GFXCLK);
> + data->gfx_max_freq_limit/100);
> smum_send_msg_to_smc_with_parameter(hwmgr,
> PPSMC_MSG_SetHardMinFclkByFreq,
> SMU10_UMD_PSTATE_PEAK_FCLK);
> @@ -495,7 +497,7 @@ static int smu10_dpm_force_dpm_level(struct pp_hwmgr *hwmgr,
>
> smum_send_msg_to_smc_with_parameter(hwmgr,
> PPSMC_MSG_SetSoftMaxGfxClk,
> - SMU10_UMD_PSTATE_PEAK_GFXCLK);
> + data->gfx_max_freq_limit/100);
> smum_send_msg_to_smc_with_parameter(hwmgr,
> PPSMC_MSG_SetSoftMaxFclkByFreq,
> SMU10_UMD_PSTATE_PEAK_FCLK);
> @@ -509,10 +511,10 @@ static int smu10_dpm_force_dpm_level(struct pp_hwmgr *hwmgr,
> case AMD_DPM_FORCED_LEVEL_PROFILE_MIN_SCLK:
> smum_send_msg_to_smc_with_parameter(hwmgr,
> PPSMC_MSG_SetHardMinGfxClk,
> - SMU10_UMD_PSTATE_MIN_GFXCLK);
> + data->gfx_min_freq_limit/100);
> smum_send_msg_to_smc_with_parameter(hwmgr,
> PPSMC_MSG_SetSoftMaxGfxClk,
> - SMU10_UMD_PSTATE_MIN_GFXCLK);
> + data->gfx_min_freq_limit/100);
> break;
> case AMD_DPM_FORCED_LEVEL_PROFILE_MIN_MCLK:
> smum_send_msg_to_smc_with_parameter(hwmgr,
> @@ -552,7 +554,7 @@ static int smu10_dpm_force_dpm_level(struct pp_hwmgr *hwmgr,
> case AMD_DPM_FORCED_LEVEL_AUTO:
> smum_send_msg_to_smc_with_parameter(hwmgr,
> PPSMC_MSG_SetHardMinGfxClk,
> - SMU10_UMD_PSTATE_MIN_GFXCLK);
> + data->gfx_min_freq_limit/100);
> smum_send_msg_to_smc_with_parameter(hwmgr,
> PPSMC_MSG_SetHardMinFclkByFreq,
> SMU10_UMD_PSTATE_MIN_FCLK);
> @@ -565,7 +567,7 @@ static int smu10_dpm_force_dpm_level(struct pp_hwmgr *hwmgr,
>
> smum_send_msg_to_smc_with_parameter(hwmgr,
> PPSMC_MSG_SetSoftMaxGfxClk,
> - SMU10_UMD_PSTATE_PEAK_GFXCLK);
> + data->gfx_max_freq_limit/100);
> smum_send_msg_to_smc_with_parameter(hwmgr,
> PPSMC_MSG_SetSoftMaxFclkByFreq,
> SMU10_UMD_PSTATE_PEAK_FCLK);
> @@ -579,10 +581,10 @@ static int smu10_dpm_force_dpm_level(struct pp_hwmgr *hwmgr,
> case AMD_DPM_FORCED_LEVEL_LOW:
> smum_send_msg_to_smc_with_parameter(hwmgr,
> PPSMC_MSG_SetHardMinGfxClk,
> - SMU10_UMD_PSTATE_MIN_GFXCLK);
> + data->gfx_min_freq_limit/100);
> smum_send_msg_to_smc_with_parameter(hwmgr,
> PPSMC_MSG_SetSoftMaxGfxClk,
> - SMU10_UMD_PSTATE_MIN_GFXCLK);
> + data->gfx_min_freq_limit/100);
> smum_send_msg_to_smc_with_parameter(hwmgr,
> PPSMC_MSG_SetHardMinFclkByFreq,
> SMU10_UMD_PSTATE_MIN_FCLK);
> @@ -730,21 +732,21 @@ static int smu10_print_clock_levels(struct pp_hwmgr *hwmgr,
> struct smu10_hwmgr *data = (struct smu10_hwmgr *)(hwmgr->backend);
> struct smu10_voltage_dependency_table *mclk_table =
> data->clock_vol_info.vdd_dep_on_fclk;
> - int i, now, size = 0;
> + uint32_t i, now, size = 0;
>
> switch (type) {
> case PP_SCLK:
> - smum_send_msg_to_smc(hwmgr, PPSMC_MSG_GetGfxclkFrequency);
> + smum_send_msg_to_smc_with_parameter(hwmgr, PPSMC_MSG_GetGfxclkFrequency, 0);
Is this change intended? This looks like a separate bug fix.
> now = smum_get_argument(hwmgr);
>
> size += sprintf(buf + size, "0: %uMhz %s\n",
> - data->gfx_min_freq_limit / 100,
> - ((data->gfx_min_freq_limit / 100)
> - == now) ? "*" : "");
> - size += sprintf(buf + size, "1: %uMhz %s\n",
> - data->gfx_max_freq_limit / 100,
> - ((data->gfx_max_freq_limit / 100)
> - == now) ? "*" : "");
> + now < SMU10_UMD_PSTATE_GFXCLK ? now : data->gfx_min_freq_limit/100,
> + now < SMU10_UMD_PSTATE_GFXCLK ? "*" : "");
> + size += sprintf(buf + size, "1: %uMhz %s\n", SMU10_UMD_PSTATE_GFXCLK,
> + now == SMU10_UMD_PSTATE_GFXCLK ? "*" : "");
> + size += sprintf(buf + size, "2: %uMhz %s\n",
> + now > SMU10_UMD_PSTATE_GFXCLK ? now : data->gfx_max_freq_limit/100,
> + now > SMU10_UMD_PSTATE_GFXCLK ? "*" : "");
> break;
> case PP_MCLK:
> smum_send_msg_to_smc(hwmgr, PPSMC_MSG_GetFclkFrequency);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/hwmgr/smu10_hwmgr.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/hwmgr/smu10_hwmgr.h
> index f68b218..1fb296a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/hwmgr/smu10_hwmgr.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/hwmgr/smu10_hwmgr.h
> @@ -311,11 +311,9 @@ struct smu10_hwmgr {
> #define SMU10_UMD_PSTATE_FCLK 933
> #define SMU10_UMD_PSTATE_VCE 0x03C00320
>
> -#define SMU10_UMD_PSTATE_PEAK_GFXCLK 1100
> #define SMU10_UMD_PSTATE_PEAK_SOCCLK 757
> #define SMU10_UMD_PSTATE_PEAK_FCLK 1200
>
> -#define SMU10_UMD_PSTATE_MIN_GFXCLK 200
> #define SMU10_UMD_PSTATE_MIN_FCLK 400
> #define SMU10_UMD_PSTATE_MIN_SOCCLK 200
> #define SMU10_UMD_PSTATE_MIN_VCE 0x0190012C
> --
> 1.9.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> amd-gfx mailing list
> amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
More information about the amd-gfx
mailing list