[PATCH v2] drm/amdgpu/sriov: For sriov runtime, use kiq to do invalidate tlb

Christian König christian.koenig at amd.com
Wed Aug 15 07:07:53 UTC 2018


> As need to let somebody to test all your bare metal test cases, such as vega10, and other asics, as I don't have those environments, and only could test sriov.
That is not much of a problem. We have plenty of people on the mailing 
list (including me) who can test this on both Vega10 and Raven.

Just remove the SRIOV check and send the patch out with a request for 
testing it on bare metal.

Christian.

Am 15.08.2018 um 04:28 schrieb Deng, Emily:
> Thanks for your review, will send a patch to review again as your suggestion. I think it will be better to use the amdgpu_sriov_vf(adev).
> As need to let somebody to test all your bare metal test cases, such as vega10, and other asics, as I don't have those environments, and only could test sriov.
> If passed those bare metal test cases and fixed the bugs if occurs, then could remove the amdgpu_sriov_vf(adev). Do you think so?
>
> Best wishes
> Emily Deng
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Christian König <ckoenig.leichtzumerken at gmail.com>
>> Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2018 8:46 PM
>> To: Deng, Emily <Emily.Deng at amd.com>; amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/amdgpu/sriov: For sriov runtime, use kiq to do
>> invalidate tlb
>>
>> Am 14.08.2018 um 12:56 schrieb Emily Deng:
>>> To avoid the tlb flush not interrupted by world switch, use kiq and
>>> one command to do tlb invalidate.
>>>
>>> v2:
>>> Add firmware version checking.
>>>
>>> SWDEV-161497
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Emily Deng <Emily.Deng at amd.com>
>>> ---
>>>    drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_virt.c | 63
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>    drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_virt.h |  2 +
>>>    drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c    |  7 ++++
>>>    3 files changed, 72 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_virt.c
>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_virt.c
>>> index 21adb1b6..436030c 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_virt.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_virt.c
>>> @@ -233,6 +233,69 @@ void amdgpu_virt_kiq_wreg(struct amdgpu_device
>> *adev, uint32_t reg, uint32_t v)
>>>    	pr_err("failed to write reg:%x\n", reg);
>>>    }
>>>
>>> +signed long  amdgpu_virt_kiq_invalidate_tlb(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
>> struct amdgpu_vmhub *hub,
>>> +		unsigned eng, u32 req, uint32_t vmid)
>> Drop that function here. It is Vega specific and doesn't belong into common
>> code.
>>
>>> +{
>>> +	signed long r, cnt = 0;
>>> +	unsigned long flags;
>>> +	uint32_t seq;
>>> +	struct amdgpu_kiq *kiq = &adev->gfx.kiq;
>>> +	struct amdgpu_ring *ring = &kiq->ring;
>>> +	struct drm_amdgpu_info_firmware fw_info;
>>> +
>>> +	if (ring->me == 1) {
>>> +		fw_info.ver = adev->gfx.mec_fw_version;
>>> +		fw_info.feature = adev->gfx.mec_feature_version;
>>> +	} else {
>>> +		fw_info.ver = adev->gfx.mec2_fw_version;
>>> +		fw_info.feature = adev->gfx.mec2_feature_version;
>>> +	}
>>> +
>>> +	if (fw_info.ver <  0x00000190 || fw_info.feature < 42)
>>> +		return -EPERM;
>> Please move that check into gfx_v9_0_ring_emit_reg_write_reg_wait().
>>
>>> +
>>> +	BUG_ON(!ring->funcs->emit_reg_write_reg_wait);
>> That check is superfluous.
>>
>>> +
>>> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&kiq->ring_lock, flags);
>>> +	amdgpu_ring_alloc(ring, 32);
>>> +	amdgpu_ring_emit_reg_write_reg_wait(ring, hub->vm_inv_eng0_req +
>> eng,
>>> +					    hub->vm_inv_eng0_ack + eng,
>>> +					    req, 1 << vmid);
>>> +	amdgpu_fence_emit_polling(ring, &seq);
>>> +	amdgpu_ring_commit(ring);
>>> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&kiq->ring_lock, flags);
>>> +
>>> +	r = amdgpu_fence_wait_polling(ring, seq, MAX_KIQ_REG_WAIT);
>>> +
>>> +	/* don't wait anymore for gpu reset case because this way may
>>> +	 * block gpu_recover() routine forever, e.g. this virt_kiq_rreg
>>> +	 * is triggered in TTM and ttm_bo_lock_delayed_workqueue() will
>>> +	 * never return if we keep waiting in virt_kiq_rreg, which cause
>>> +	 * gpu_recover() hang there.
>>> +	 *
>>> +	 * also don't wait anymore for IRQ context
>>> +	 * */
>>> +	if (r < 1 && (adev->in_gpu_reset || in_interrupt()))
>>> +		goto failed_kiq;
>>> +
>>> +	if (in_interrupt())
>>> +		might_sleep();
>>> +
>>> +	while (r < 1 && cnt++ < MAX_KIQ_REG_TRY) {
>>> +		msleep(MAX_KIQ_REG_BAILOUT_INTERVAL);
>>> +		r = amdgpu_fence_wait_polling(ring, seq,
>> MAX_KIQ_REG_WAIT);
>>> +	}
>>> +
>>> +	if (cnt > MAX_KIQ_REG_TRY)
>>> +		goto failed_kiq;
>>> +
>>> +	return 0;
>>> +
>>> +failed_kiq:
>>> +	pr_err("failed to invalidate tlb with kiq\n");
>>> +	return r;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>>    /**
>>>     * amdgpu_virt_request_full_gpu() - request full gpu access
>>>     * @amdgpu:	amdgpu device.
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_virt.h
>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_virt.h
>>> index 880ac11..8908ff9 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_virt.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_virt.h
>>> @@ -288,6 +288,8 @@ void amdgpu_free_static_csa(struct amdgpu_device
>> *adev);
>>>    void amdgpu_virt_init_setting(struct amdgpu_device *adev);
>>>    uint32_t amdgpu_virt_kiq_rreg(struct amdgpu_device *adev, uint32_t reg);
>>>    void amdgpu_virt_kiq_wreg(struct amdgpu_device *adev, uint32_t reg,
>>> uint32_t v);
>>> +signed long  amdgpu_virt_kiq_invalidate_tlb(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
>> struct amdgpu_vmhub *hub,
>>> +		unsigned eng, u32 req, uint32_t vmid);
>>>    int amdgpu_virt_request_full_gpu(struct amdgpu_device *adev, bool init);
>>>    int amdgpu_virt_release_full_gpu(struct amdgpu_device *adev, bool init);
>>>    int amdgpu_virt_reset_gpu(struct amdgpu_device *adev); diff --git
>>> a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c
>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c
>>> index 6999042..812f71e 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c
>>> @@ -331,6 +331,7 @@ static void gmc_v9_0_flush_gpu_tlb(struct
>> amdgpu_device *adev,
>>>    	/* Use register 17 for GART */
>>>    	const unsigned eng = 17;
>>>    	unsigned i, j;
>>> +	int r;
>>>
>>>    	spin_lock(&adev->gmc.invalidate_lock);
>>>
>>> @@ -338,6 +339,12 @@ static void gmc_v9_0_flush_gpu_tlb(struct
>> amdgpu_device *adev,
>>>    		struct amdgpu_vmhub *hub = &adev->vmhub[i];
>>>    		u32 tmp = gmc_v9_0_get_invalidate_req(vmid);
>>>
>>> +		if (amdgpu_sriov_vf(adev) && amdgpu_sriov_runtime(adev)) {
>>> +			r = amdgpu_virt_kiq_invalidate_tlb(adev, hub, eng, tmp,
>> vmid);
>>> +			if (!r)
>>> +				continue;
>>> +		}
>>> +
>> Drop that SRIOV check here. We don't want specialized code path for SRIOV.
>>
>> Christian.
>>
>>>    		WREG32_NO_KIQ(hub->vm_inv_eng0_req + eng, tmp);
>>>
>>>    		/* Busy wait for ACK.*/



More information about the amd-gfx mailing list