[PATCH v4 4/5] drm/amdgpu: use bulk moves for efficient VM LRU handling (v4)

Christian König ckoenig.leichtzumerken at gmail.com
Mon Aug 20 13:17:12 UTC 2018


Am 20.08.2018 um 08:05 schrieb Huang Rui:
> On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 06:38:16PM +0800, Koenig, Christian wrote:
>> Am 17.08.2018 um 12:08 schrieb Huang Rui:
>>> I continue to work for bulk moving that based on the proposal by Christian.
>>>
>>> Background:
>>> amdgpu driver will move all PD/PT and PerVM BOs into idle list. Then move all of
>>> them on the end of LRU list one by one. Thus, that cause so many BOs moved to
>>> the end of the LRU, and impact performance seriously.
>>>
>>> Then Christian provided a workaround to not move PD/PT BOs on LRU with below
>>> patch:
>>> "drm/amdgpu: band aid validating VM PTs"
>>> Commit 0bbf32026cf5ba41e9922b30e26e1bed1ecd38ae
>>>
>>> However, the final solution should bulk move all PD/PT and PerVM BOs on the LRU
>>> instead of one by one.
>>>
>>> Whenever amdgpu_vm_validate_pt_bos() is called and we have BOs which need to be
>>> validated we move all BOs together to the end of the LRU without dropping the
>>> lock for the LRU.
>>>
>>> While doing so we note the beginning and end of this block in the LRU list.
>>>
>>> Now when amdgpu_vm_validate_pt_bos() is called and we don't have anything to do,
>>> we don't move every BO one by one, but instead cut the LRU list into pieces so
>>> that we bulk move everything to the end in just one operation.
>>>
>>> Test data:
>>> +--------------+-----------------+-----------+---------------------------------------+
>>> |              |The Talos        |Clpeak(OCL)|BusSpeedReadback(OCL)                  |
>>> |              |Principle(Vulkan)|           |                                       |
>>> +------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
>>> |              |                 |           |0.319 ms(1k) 0.314 ms(2K) 0.308 ms(4K) |
>>> | Original     |  147.7 FPS      |  76.86 us |0.307 ms(8K) 0.310 ms(16K)             |
>>> +------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
>>> | Orignial + WA|                 |           |0.254 ms(1K) 0.241 ms(2K)              |
>>> |(don't move   |  162.1 FPS      |  42.15 us |0.230 ms(4K) 0.223 ms(8K) 0.204 ms(16K)|
>>> |PT BOs on LRU)|                 |           |                                       |
>>> +------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
>>> | Bulk move    |  163.1 FPS      |  40.52 us |0.244 ms(1K) 0.252 ms(2K) 0.213 ms(4K) |
>>> |              |                 |           |0.214 ms(8K) 0.225 ms(16K)             |
>>> +--------------+-----------------+-----------+---------------------------------------+
>>>
>>> After test them with above three benchmarks include vulkan and opencl. We can
>>> see the visible improvement than original, and even better than original with
>>> workaround.
>>>
>>> v2: move all BOs include idle, relocated, and moved list to the end of LRU and
>>> put them together.
>>> v3: remove unused parameter and use list_for_each_entry instead of the one with
>>> save entry.
>>> v4: move the amdgpu_vm_move_to_lru_tail after command submission, at that time,
>>> all bo will be back on idle list.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang at amd.com>
>>> Tested-by: Mike Lothian <mike at fireburn.co.uk>
>>> Tested-by: Dieter Nützel <Dieter at nuetzel-hh.de>
>>> Acked-by: Chunming Zhou <david1.zhou at amd.com>
>>> ---
>>>    drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c | 11 ++++++
>>>    drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>>>    drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.h | 11 +++++-
>>>    3 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c
>>> index 502b94f..9fbdf02 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c
>>> @@ -1260,6 +1260,16 @@ static int amdgpu_cs_submit(struct amdgpu_cs_parser *p,
>>>    	return 0;
>>>    }
>>>    
>>> +static void amdgpu_cs_vm_move_on_lru(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
>>> +				     struct amdgpu_cs_parser *p)
>>> +{
>>> +	struct amdgpu_fpriv *fpriv = p->filp->driver_priv;
>>> +	struct amdgpu_vm *vm = &fpriv->vm;
>>> +
>>> +	if (vm->validated)
>> That check belongs inside amdgpu_vm_move_to_lru_tail().
>>
>>> +		amdgpu_vm_move_to_lru_tail(adev, vm);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>>    int amdgpu_cs_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_file *filp)
>>>    {
>>>    	struct amdgpu_device *adev = dev->dev_private;
>>> @@ -1310,6 +1320,7 @@ int amdgpu_cs_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_file *filp)
>>>    
>>>    	r = amdgpu_cs_submit(&parser, cs);
>>>    
>>> +	amdgpu_cs_vm_move_on_lru(adev, &parser);
>>>    out:
>>>    	amdgpu_cs_parser_fini(&parser, r, reserved_buffers);
>>>    	return r;
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c
>>> index 9c84770..037cfbc 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c
>>> @@ -268,6 +268,53 @@ void amdgpu_vm_get_pd_bo(struct amdgpu_vm *vm,
>>>    }
>>>    
>>>    /**
>>> + * amdgpu_vm_move_to_lru_tail_by_list - move one list of BOs to end of LRU
>>> + *
>>> + * @vm: vm providing the BOs
>>> + * @list: the list that stored BOs
>>> + *
>>> + * Move one list of BOs to the end of LRU and update the positions.
>>> + */
>>> +static void
>>> +amdgpu_vm_move_to_lru_tail_by_list(struct amdgpu_vm *vm, struct list_head *list)
>> I don't see much of a point having a separate function for this any more.
>>
>>> +{
>>> +	struct amdgpu_vm_bo_base *bo_base;
>>> +
>>> +	list_for_each_entry(bo_base, list, vm_status) {
>>> +		struct amdgpu_bo *bo = bo_base->bo;
>>> +
>>> +		if (!bo->parent)
>>> +			continue;
>>> +
>>> +		ttm_bo_move_to_lru_tail(&bo->tbo, &vm->lru_bulk_move);
>>> +		if (bo->shadow)
>>> +			ttm_bo_move_to_lru_tail(&bo->shadow->tbo,
>>> +						&vm->lru_bulk_move);
>>> +	}
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +/**
>>> + * amdgpu_vm_move_to_lru_tail - move all BOs to the end of LRU
>>> + *
>>> + * @adev: amdgpu device pointer
>>> + * @vm: vm providing the BOs
>>> + *
>>> + * Move all BOs to the end of LRU and remember their positions to put them
>>> + * together.
>>> + */
>>> +void amdgpu_vm_move_to_lru_tail(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
>>> +				struct amdgpu_vm *vm)
>>> +{
>>> +	struct ttm_bo_global *glob = adev->mman.bdev.glob;
>>> +
>>> +	memset(&vm->lru_bulk_move, 0, sizeof(vm->lru_bulk_move));
>>> +
>>> +	spin_lock(&glob->lru_lock);
>>> +	amdgpu_vm_move_to_lru_tail_by_list(vm, &vm->idle);
>>> +	spin_unlock(&glob->lru_lock);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +/**
>>>     * amdgpu_vm_validate_pt_bos - validate the page table BOs
>>>     *
>>>     * @adev: amdgpu device pointer
>>> @@ -288,6 +335,7 @@ int amdgpu_vm_validate_pt_bos(struct amdgpu_device *adev, struct amdgpu_vm *vm,
>>>    	struct amdgpu_vm_bo_base *bo_base, *tmp;
>>>    	int r = 0;
>>>    
>>> +	vm->validated = false;
>> That won't work like this. It is perfectly possible that CS is aborted
>> because of a signal and amdgpu_vm_move_to_lru_tail() never called.
>>
>> I suggest to do "vm->validated |= !list_empty(&vm->evicted);" here and
>> then set it to false again in amdgpu_vm_move_to_lru_tail().
>>
>> And maybe we need a better name than "validated", maybe "bulk_moveable"
>> or something like that.
>>
> Actually, "validated" is opposite to "bulk_moveable".
> So how about use "vm->bulk_moveable = list_empty(&vm->evicted);" here

That still won't work correct. See the validation can be interrupted.

So we need something like "vm->bulk_moveable &= 
list_empty(&vm->evicted);" here.

Apart from that this now looks really good to me.

Regards,
Christian.

>
> Then check the flag after moving the ttm_bo_bulk_move_lru_tail() into
> amdgpu_vm_move_to_lru_tail() like below:
>
> void amdgpu_vm_move_to_lru_tail(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
>                                  struct amdgpu_vm *vm)
> {
>          struct ttm_bo_global *glob = adev->mman.bdev.glob;
>          struct amdgpu_vm_bo_base *bo_base;
>
>          if (vm->bulk_moveable) {
>                  spin_lock(&glob->lru_lock);
>                  ttm_bo_bulk_move_lru_tail(&vm->lru_bulk_move);
>                  spin_unlock(&glob->lru_lock);
>                  return;
>          }
>
>          memset(&vm->lru_bulk_move, 0, sizeof(vm->lru_bulk_move));
>
>          spin_lock(&glob->lru_lock);
>          list_for_each_entry(bo_base, &vm->idle, vm_status) {
>                  struct amdgpu_bo *bo = bo_base->bo;
>
>                  if (!bo->parent)
>                          continue;
>
>                  ttm_bo_move_to_lru_tail(&bo->tbo, &vm->lru_bulk_move);
>                  if (bo->shadow)
>                          ttm_bo_move_to_lru_tail(&bo->shadow->tbo,
>                                                  &vm->lru_bulk_move);
>          }
>          spin_unlock(&glob->lru_lock);
>
>          vm->bulk_moveable = true;
> }
>
> Thanks,
> Ray
>
>>>    	list_for_each_entry_safe(bo_base, tmp, &vm->evicted, vm_status) {
>>>    		struct amdgpu_bo *bo = bo_base->bo;
>>>    
>>> @@ -295,14 +343,9 @@ int amdgpu_vm_validate_pt_bos(struct amdgpu_device *adev, struct amdgpu_vm *vm,
>>>    			r = validate(param, bo);
>>>    			if (r)
>>>    				break;
>>> -
>>> -			spin_lock(&glob->lru_lock);
>>> -			ttm_bo_move_to_lru_tail(&bo->tbo, NULL);
>>> -			if (bo->shadow)
>>> -				ttm_bo_move_to_lru_tail(&bo->shadow->tbo, NULL);
>>> -			spin_unlock(&glob->lru_lock);
>>>    		}
>>>    
>>> +		vm->validated = true;
>>>    		if (bo->tbo.type != ttm_bo_type_kernel) {
>>>    			spin_lock(&vm->moved_lock);
>>>    			list_move(&bo_base->vm_status, &vm->moved);
>>> @@ -312,20 +355,14 @@ int amdgpu_vm_validate_pt_bos(struct amdgpu_device *adev, struct amdgpu_vm *vm,
>>>    		}
>>>    	}
>>>    
>>> -	spin_lock(&glob->lru_lock);
>>> -	list_for_each_entry(bo_base, &vm->idle, vm_status) {
>>> -		struct amdgpu_bo *bo = bo_base->bo;
>>> -
>>> -		if (!bo->parent)
>>> -			continue;
>>> +	if (vm->validated)
>>> +		return 0;
>>>    
>>> -		ttm_bo_move_to_lru_tail(&bo->tbo, NULL);
>>> -		if (bo->shadow)
>>> -			ttm_bo_move_to_lru_tail(&bo->shadow->tbo, NULL);
>>> -	}
>>> +	spin_lock(&glob->lru_lock);
>>> +	ttm_bo_bulk_move_lru_tail(&vm->lru_bulk_move);
>>>    	spin_unlock(&glob->lru_lock);
>> Probably best to move that into amdgpu_vm_move_to_lru_tail() as well.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Christian.
>>
>>>    
>>> -	return r;
>>> +	return 0;
>>>    }
>>>    
>>>    /**
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.h
>>> index 67a15d4..85d57bb 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.h
>>> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
>>>    #include <linux/rbtree.h>
>>>    #include <drm/gpu_scheduler.h>
>>>    #include <drm/drm_file.h>
>>> +#include <drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h>
>>>    
>>>    #include "amdgpu_sync.h"
>>>    #include "amdgpu_ring.h"
>>> @@ -226,6 +227,11 @@ struct amdgpu_vm {
>>>    
>>>    	/* Some basic info about the task */
>>>    	struct amdgpu_task_info task_info;
>>> +
>>> +	/* Store positions of group of BOs */
>>> +	struct ttm_lru_bulk_move lru_bulk_move;
>>> +	/* mark whether has bo validated on evicted list */
>>> +	bool			validated;
>>>    };
>>>    
>>>    struct amdgpu_vm_manager {
>>> @@ -330,8 +336,11 @@ bool amdgpu_vm_need_pipeline_sync(struct amdgpu_ring *ring,
>>>    void amdgpu_vm_check_compute_bug(struct amdgpu_device *adev);
>>>    
>>>    void amdgpu_vm_get_task_info(struct amdgpu_device *adev, unsigned int pasid,
>>> -			 struct amdgpu_task_info *task_info);
>>> +			     struct amdgpu_task_info *task_info);
>>>    
>>>    void amdgpu_vm_set_task_info(struct amdgpu_vm *vm);
>>>    
>>> +void amdgpu_vm_move_to_lru_tail(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
>>> +				struct amdgpu_vm *vm);
>>> +
>>>    #endif
> _______________________________________________
> amd-gfx mailing list
> amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx



More information about the amd-gfx mailing list