KFD co-maintainership and branch model

[Felix Kuehling]

On 2018-08-23 08:38 AM, Deucher, Alexander wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Christian König <ckoenig.leichtzumerken at gmail.com>
>> Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2018 3:01 AM
>> To: Oded Gabbay <oded.gabbay at gmail.com>; Dave Airlie
>> <airlied at redhat.com>
>> Cc: Deucher, Alexander <Alexander.Deucher at amd.com>; Kuehling, Felix
>> <Felix.Kuehling at amd.com>; amd-gfx list <amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org>
>> Subject: Re: KFD co-maintainership and branch model
>>
>> Am 23.08.2018 um 08:54 schrieb Oded Gabbay:
>>> On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 4:34 AM David Airlie <airlied at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 8:25 AM, Felix Kuehling
>> <felix.kuehling at amd.com> wrote:
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> Oded has offered to make me co-maintainer of KFD, as he's super busy
>>>>> at work and less responsive than he used to be.
>>>>>
>>>>> At the same time we're about to send out the first patches to merge
>>>>> KFD and AMDGPU into a single kernel module.
>>>>>
>>>>> With that in mind I'd like to propose to upstream KFD through Alex's
>>>>> branch in the future. It would avoid conflicts in shared code
>>>>> (amdgpu_vm.c is most active at the moment) when merging branches,
>>>>> and make the code flow and testing easier.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please let me know what you think?
>>>>>
>>>> Works for me.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Dave.
>>> Works for me as well.
>> Sounds good to me as well.
> Works for me as well.

Thank you. We have agreement.

Right now KFD in amd-staging-drm-next is a bit behind what's drm-next.
Alex, are you planning to rebase amd-staging-drm-next soon? If not, I'd
like to cherry-pick the missing commits before applying anything new.

Regards,
  Felix

>
> Alex
>
>> Christian.
>>
>>> Oded
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> amd-gfx mailing list
>>> amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
>>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx