[PATCH 2/2] drm/amdgpu: update MC firmware image for polaris10 variants

[Alex Deucher]

On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 3:40 AM Zhang, Jerry(Junwei) <Jerry.Zhang at amd.com> wrote:
>
> we can drop MC update patch, since a new fw could fix that.

Shouldn't we apply this as well for consistency?

Alex

>
> Regards,
> Jerry
>
> On 12/7/18 3:19 PM, Junwei Zhang wrote:
> > Some new variants require different firmwares.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Junwei Zhang <Jerry.Zhang at amd.com>
> > ---
> >   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v8_0.c | 5 ++++-
> >   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v8_0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v8_0.c
> > index 1ad7e6b8ed1d..0edb8622f666 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v8_0.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v8_0.c
> > @@ -244,7 +244,10 @@ static int gmc_v8_0_init_microcode(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
> >       case CHIP_POLARIS10:
> >               if ((adev->pdev->device == 0x67df) &&
> >                   ((adev->pdev->revision == 0xe1) ||
> > -                  (adev->pdev->revision == 0xf7)))
> > +                  (adev->pdev->revision == 0xf7)) ||
> > +                 ((adev->pdev->device == 0x6fdf) &&
> > +                  ((adev->pdev->revision == 0xef) ||
> > +                   (adev->pdev->revision == 0xff))))
> >                       chip_name = "polaris10_k";
> >               else
> >                       chip_name = "polaris10";
>
> _______________________________________________
> amd-gfx mailing list
> amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx