[PATCH 4/4] drm/amdkfd: Use ordered workqueue to restore processes
Oded Gabbay
oded.gabbay at gmail.com
Tue Mar 27 13:56:04 UTC 2018
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 10:30 PM, Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling at amd.com> wrote:
>
> Restoring multiple processes concurrently can lead to live-locks
> where each process prevents the other from validating all its BOs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling at amd.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_module.c | 6 +++++-
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_priv.h | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_process.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_module.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_module.c
> index b0acb06..e0c07d2 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_module.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_module.c
> @@ -133,7 +133,9 @@ static int __init kfd_module_init(void)
> if (err < 0)
> goto err_topology;
>
> - kfd_process_create_wq();
> + err = kfd_process_create_wq();
> + if (err < 0)
> + goto err_create_wq;
>
> kfd_debugfs_init();
>
> @@ -143,6 +145,8 @@ static int __init kfd_module_init(void)
>
> return 0;
>
> +err_create_wq:
> + kfd_topology_shutdown();
> err_topology:
> kfd_chardev_exit();
> err_ioctl:
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_priv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_priv.h
> index db27f9f..96a9cc0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_priv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_priv.h
> @@ -674,7 +674,7 @@ struct amdkfd_ioctl_desc {
> const char *name;
> };
>
> -void kfd_process_create_wq(void);
> +int kfd_process_create_wq(void);
> void kfd_process_destroy_wq(void);
> struct kfd_process *kfd_create_process(struct file *filep);
> struct kfd_process *kfd_get_process(const struct task_struct *);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_process.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_process.c
> index 45ef2d0..75fdc18 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_process.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_process.c
> @@ -48,8 +48,17 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(kfd_processes_mutex);
>
> DEFINE_SRCU(kfd_processes_srcu);
>
> +/* For process termination handling */
> static struct workqueue_struct *kfd_process_wq;
>
> +/* Ordered, single-threaded workqueue for restoring evicted
> + * processes. Restoring multiple processes concurrently under memory
> + * pressure can lead to processes blocking each other from validating
> + * their BOs and result in a live-lock situation where processes
> + * remain evicted indefinitely.
> + */
> +static struct workqueue_struct *kfd_restore_wq;
> +
> static struct kfd_process *find_process(const struct task_struct *thread);
> static void kfd_process_ref_release(struct kref *ref);
> static struct kfd_process *create_process(const struct task_struct *thread,
> @@ -59,10 +68,19 @@ static void evict_process_worker(struct work_struct *work);
> static void restore_process_worker(struct work_struct *work);
>
>
> -void kfd_process_create_wq(void)
> +int kfd_process_create_wq(void)
> {
> if (!kfd_process_wq)
> kfd_process_wq = alloc_workqueue("kfd_process_wq", 0, 0);
> + if (!kfd_restore_wq)
> + kfd_restore_wq = alloc_ordered_workqueue("kfd_restore_wq", 0);
> +
> + if (!kfd_restore_wq || !kfd_restore_wq) {
Should be
if (!kfd_process_wq|| !kfd_restore_wq) {
>
> + kfd_process_destroy_wq();
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> }
>
> void kfd_process_destroy_wq(void)
> @@ -71,6 +89,10 @@ void kfd_process_destroy_wq(void)
> destroy_workqueue(kfd_process_wq);
> kfd_process_wq = NULL;
> }
> + if (kfd_restore_wq) {
> + destroy_workqueue(kfd_restore_wq);
> + kfd_restore_wq = NULL;
> + }
> }
>
> static void kfd_process_free_gpuvm(struct kgd_mem *mem,
> @@ -869,7 +891,7 @@ static void evict_process_worker(struct work_struct *work)
> dma_fence_signal(p->ef);
> dma_fence_put(p->ef);
> p->ef = NULL;
> - schedule_delayed_work(&p->restore_work,
> + queue_delayed_work(kfd_restore_wq, &p->restore_work,
> msecs_to_jiffies(PROCESS_RESTORE_TIME_MS));
>
> pr_debug("Finished evicting pasid %d\n", p->pasid);
> @@ -918,7 +940,7 @@ static void restore_process_worker(struct work_struct *work)
> if (ret) {
> pr_debug("Failed to restore BOs of pasid %d, retry after %d ms\n",
> p->pasid, PROCESS_BACK_OFF_TIME_MS);
> - ret = schedule_delayed_work(&p->restore_work,
> + ret = queue_delayed_work(kfd_restore_wq, &p->restore_work,
> msecs_to_jiffies(PROCESS_BACK_OFF_TIME_MS));
> WARN(!ret, "reschedule restore work failed\n");
> return;
> @@ -957,7 +979,7 @@ int kfd_resume_all_processes(void)
> int ret = 0, idx = srcu_read_lock(&kfd_processes_srcu);
>
> hash_for_each_rcu(kfd_processes_table, temp, p, kfd_processes) {
> - if (!schedule_delayed_work(&p->restore_work, 0)) {
> + if (!queue_delayed_work(kfd_restore_wq, &p->restore_work, 0)) {
> pr_err("Restore process %d failed during resume\n",
> p->pasid);
> ret = -EFAULT;
> --
> 2.7.4
>
I fixed the comment above. No need to resend.
This patch is:
Reviewed-by: Oded Gabbay <oded.gabbay at gmail.com>
More information about the amd-gfx
mailing list