[PATCH 01/13] ttm: abstruct evictable bo

[zhoucm1]

On 2018年05月09日 17:50, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 10:34:51AM +0200, Lucas Stach wrote:
>> All of those changes are including a Change-Id that has no bearing in
>> upstream patches and are missing a proper commit description explaining
>> why a specific change is done.
> Imo the Change-Id: is ok if it makes people happy wrt internal tracking.
> Linus might blow up, but there's lots of random nonsense that Linus blows
> up on, so whatever.
Yeah, Change-Id is just used internal, When upstreaming, it is removed. 
Alex, right? I'm not clear how you handle that when you upstream our 
internal patches.

>
> Lack of real commit message that explains stuff is the real thing here I'd
> say.
Agree, lacking commit message is really bad, that could be because this 
is a big feature, I was busy with implementing before.
If Christian agree with my this idea, I will update more commit for 
every patch when sending again.

Thanks,
David Zhou
> -Daniel
>
>> Regards,
>> Lucas
>>
>> Am Mittwoch, den 09.05.2018, 14:45 +0800 schrieb Chunming Zhou:
>>> Change-Id: Ie81985282fab1e564fc2948109fae2173613b465
>>>> Signed-off-by: Chunming Zhou <david1.zhou at amd.com>
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>>>   1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>> index 98e06f8bf23b..15506682a0be 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>> @@ -704,22 +704,20 @@ static bool ttm_bo_evict_swapout_allowable(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
>>>>   	return ret;
>>>   }
>>>   
>>> -static int ttm_mem_evict_first(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev,
>>>> -			       uint32_t mem_type,
>>>> -			       const struct ttm_place *place,
>>>> -			       struct ttm_operation_ctx *ctx)
>>> +static struct ttm_buffer_object *
>>> +ttm_mem_get_evictable_bo(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev,
>>>> +			 uint32_t mem_type,
>>>> +			 const struct ttm_place *place,
>>>> +			 struct ttm_operation_ctx *ctx,
>>>> +			 bool *locked)
>>>   {
>>>> -	struct ttm_bo_global *glob = bdev->glob;
>>>> -	struct ttm_mem_type_manager *man = &bdev->man[mem_type];
>>>>   	struct ttm_buffer_object *bo = NULL;
>>>> -	bool locked = false;
>>>> -	unsigned i;
>>>> -	int ret;
>>>> +	struct ttm_mem_type_manager *man = &bdev->man[mem_type];
>>>> +	int i;
>>>   
>>>> -	spin_lock(&glob->lru_lock);
>>>>   	for (i = 0; i < TTM_MAX_BO_PRIORITY; ++i) {
>>>>   		list_for_each_entry(bo, &man->lru[i], lru) {
>>>> -			if (!ttm_bo_evict_swapout_allowable(bo, ctx, &locked))
>>>> +			if (!ttm_bo_evict_swapout_allowable(bo, ctx, locked))
>>>>   				continue;
>>>   
>>>>   			if (place && !bdev->driver->eviction_valuable(bo,
>>> @@ -738,6 +736,21 @@ static int ttm_mem_evict_first(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev,
>>>>   		bo = NULL;
>>>>   	}
>>>   
>>>> +	return bo;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int ttm_mem_evict_first(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev,
>>>> +			       uint32_t mem_type,
>>>> +			       const struct ttm_place *place,
>>>> +			       struct ttm_operation_ctx *ctx)
>>> +{
>>>> +	struct ttm_bo_global *glob = bdev->glob;
>>>> +	struct ttm_buffer_object *bo = NULL;
>>>> +	bool locked = false;
>>>> +	int ret;
>>> +
>>>> +	spin_lock(&glob->lru_lock);
>>>> +	bo = ttm_mem_get_evictable_bo(bdev, mem_type, place, ctx, &locked);
>>>>   	if (!bo) {
>>>>   		spin_unlock(&glob->lru_lock);
>>>>   		return -EBUSY;
>> _______________________________________________
>> dri-devel mailing list
>> dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel