[PATCH libdrm] amdgpu: add VM test to exercise max/min address space
Christian König
ckoenig.leichtzumerken at gmail.com
Mon Oct 29 07:32:46 UTC 2018
Am 29.10.18 um 06:50 schrieb Zhang, Jerry:
> 在 2018年10月26日,18:59,Christian König <ckoenig.leichtzumerken at gmail.com> 写道:
>> Make sure the kernel doesn't crash if we map something at the minimum/maximum address.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com>
>> ---
>> tests/amdgpu/vm_tests.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tests/amdgpu/vm_tests.c b/tests/amdgpu/vm_tests.c
>> index 7b6dc5d6..bbdeef4d 100644
>> --- a/tests/amdgpu/vm_tests.c
>> +++ b/tests/amdgpu/vm_tests.c
>> @@ -31,8 +31,8 @@ static amdgpu_device_handle device_handle;
>> static uint32_t major_version;
>> static uint32_t minor_version;
>>
>> -
>> static void amdgpu_vmid_reserve_test(void);
>> +static void amdgpu_vm_mapping_test(void);
>>
>> CU_BOOL suite_vm_tests_enable(void)
>> {
>> @@ -84,6 +84,7 @@ int suite_vm_tests_clean(void)
>>
>> CU_TestInfo vm_tests[] = {
>> { "resere vmid test", amdgpu_vmid_reserve_test },
>> + { "vm mapping test", amdgpu_vm_mapping_test },
>> CU_TEST_INFO_NULL,
>> };
>>
>> @@ -167,3 +168,45 @@ static void amdgpu_vmid_reserve_test(void)
>> r = amdgpu_cs_ctx_free(context_handle);
>> CU_ASSERT_EQUAL(r, 0);
>> }
>> +
>> +static void amdgpu_vm_mapping_test(void)
>> +{
>> + struct amdgpu_bo_alloc_request req = {0};
>> + struct drm_amdgpu_info_device dev_info;
>> + const uint64_t size = 4096;
>> + amdgpu_bo_handle buf;
>> + uint64_t addr;
>> + int r;
>> +
>> + req.alloc_size = size;
>> + req.phys_alignment = 0;
>> + req.preferred_heap = AMDGPU_GEM_DOMAIN_GTT;
>> + req.flags = 0;
>> +
>> + r = amdgpu_bo_alloc(device_handle, &req, &buf);
>> + CU_ASSERT_EQUAL(r, 0);
>> +
>> + r = amdgpu_query_info(device_handle, AMDGPU_INFO_DEV_INFO,
>> + sizeof(dev_info), &dev_info);
>> + CU_ASSERT_EQUAL(r, 0);
>> +
>> + addr = dev_info.virtual_address_offset;
>> + r = amdgpu_bo_va_op(buf, 0, size, addr, 0, AMDGPU_VA_OP_MAP);
>> + CU_ASSERT_EQUAL(r, 0);
> Please confirm:
>
> We may need to unmap the VA before bo free, although this VA range is unlikely to be used by other test cases.
Unmapping is unnecessary, VA mappings of BOs are automatically removed
when the BO is freed.
> BTW, is it a chance in practice that a process may map different VA ranges to the same bo?
Yeah, that is used quite extensively with PRTs.
Regards,
Christian.
>
> Regards,
> Jerry
>
>> +
>> + addr = dev_info.virtual_address_max - size;
>> + r = amdgpu_bo_va_op(buf, 0, size, addr, 0, AMDGPU_VA_OP_MAP);
>> + CU_ASSERT_EQUAL(r, 0);
>> +
>> + if (dev_info.high_va_offset) {
>> + addr = dev_info.high_va_offset;
>> + r = amdgpu_bo_va_op(buf, 0, size, addr, 0, AMDGPU_VA_OP_MAP);
>> + CU_ASSERT_EQUAL(r, 0);
>> +
>> + addr = dev_info.high_va_max - size;
>> + r = amdgpu_bo_va_op(buf, 0, size, addr, 0, AMDGPU_VA_OP_MAP);
>> + CU_ASSERT_EQUAL(r, 0);
>> + }
>> +
>> + amdgpu_bo_free(buf);
>> +}
>> --
>> 2.17.1
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> amd-gfx mailing list
>> amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
More information about the amd-gfx
mailing list