[PATCH libdrm] amdgpu: add VM test to exercise max/min address space
Zhang, Jerry
Jerry.Zhang at amd.com
Mon Oct 29 09:13:24 UTC 2018
在 2018年10月29日,16:40,Koenig, Christian <Christian.Koenig at amd.com> 写道:
>
> Am 29.10.18 um 09:13 schrieb Zhang, Jerry:
>> 在 2018年10月29日,15:32,Christian König <ckoenig.leichtzumerken at gmail.com> 写道:
>>> Am 29.10.18 um 06:50 schrieb Zhang, Jerry:
>>>> 在 2018年10月26日,18:59,Christian König <ckoenig.leichtzumerken at gmail.com> 写道:
>>>>> Make sure the kernel doesn't crash if we map something at the minimum/maximum address.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> tests/amdgpu/vm_tests.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>>>> 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/tests/amdgpu/vm_tests.c b/tests/amdgpu/vm_tests.c
>>>>> index 7b6dc5d6..bbdeef4d 100644
>>>>> --- a/tests/amdgpu/vm_tests.c
>>>>> +++ b/tests/amdgpu/vm_tests.c
>>>>> @@ -31,8 +31,8 @@ static amdgpu_device_handle device_handle;
>>>>> static uint32_t major_version;
>>>>> static uint32_t minor_version;
>>>>>
>>>>> -
>>>>> static void amdgpu_vmid_reserve_test(void);
>>>>> +static void amdgpu_vm_mapping_test(void);
>>>>>
>>>>> CU_BOOL suite_vm_tests_enable(void)
>>>>> {
>>>>> @@ -84,6 +84,7 @@ int suite_vm_tests_clean(void)
>>>>>
>>>>> CU_TestInfo vm_tests[] = {
>>>>> { "resere vmid test", amdgpu_vmid_reserve_test },
>>>>> + { "vm mapping test", amdgpu_vm_mapping_test },
>>>>> CU_TEST_INFO_NULL,
>>>>> };
>>>>>
>>>>> @@ -167,3 +168,45 @@ static void amdgpu_vmid_reserve_test(void)
>>>>> r = amdgpu_cs_ctx_free(context_handle);
>>>>> CU_ASSERT_EQUAL(r, 0);
>>>>> }
>>>>> +
>>>>> +static void amdgpu_vm_mapping_test(void)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> + struct amdgpu_bo_alloc_request req = {0};
>>>>> + struct drm_amdgpu_info_device dev_info;
>>>>> + const uint64_t size = 4096;
>>>>> + amdgpu_bo_handle buf;
>>>>> + uint64_t addr;
>>>>> + int r;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + req.alloc_size = size;
>>>>> + req.phys_alignment = 0;
>>>>> + req.preferred_heap = AMDGPU_GEM_DOMAIN_GTT;
>>>>> + req.flags = 0;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + r = amdgpu_bo_alloc(device_handle, &req, &buf);
>>>>> + CU_ASSERT_EQUAL(r, 0);
>>>>> +
>>>>> + r = amdgpu_query_info(device_handle, AMDGPU_INFO_DEV_INFO,
>>>>> + sizeof(dev_info), &dev_info);
>>>>> + CU_ASSERT_EQUAL(r, 0);
>>>>> +
>>>>> + addr = dev_info.virtual_address_offset;
>>>>> + r = amdgpu_bo_va_op(buf, 0, size, addr, 0, AMDGPU_VA_OP_MAP);
>>>>> + CU_ASSERT_EQUAL(r, 0);
>>>> Please confirm:
>>>>
>>>> We may need to unmap the VA before bo free, although this VA range is unlikely to be used by other test cases.
>>> Unmapping is unnecessary, VA mappings of BOs are automatically removed when the BO is freed.
>> Ah, correct. Feel free to add
>> Reviewed-by: Junwei Zhang <Jerry.Zhang at amd.com>
>
> Thanks.
>
>>
>>>> BTW, is it a chance in practice that a process may map different VA ranges to the same bo?
>>> Yeah, that is used quite extensively with PRTs.
>> PRT may use different ranges in entire BO.
>> What I actually mean is the same bo range, e.g. 1 page of BO starting from offset 0, mapping to different VA ranges, like what the test does now.
>
> Good point, but that should also be used by PRT mappings.
>
> E.g. what we do with PRT is to have a BO filled with parts of a texture.
> This BO is then mapped once completely form start till end
It sounds MAP with map op
> and once page by page into the sparse populated PRT texture.
It sounds REPLACE with map op
Is there a case that map(MAP) the same bo range by different VA ranges?
work as a physical ram range is mapped by different virtual address.
Jerry
>
> Christian.
>
>>
>> Jerry
>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Christian.
>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Jerry
>>>>
>>>>> +
>>>>> + addr = dev_info.virtual_address_max - size;
>>>>> + r = amdgpu_bo_va_op(buf, 0, size, addr, 0, AMDGPU_VA_OP_MAP);
>>>>> + CU_ASSERT_EQUAL(r, 0);
>>>>> +
>>>>> + if (dev_info.high_va_offset) {
>>>>> + addr = dev_info.high_va_offset;
>>>>> + r = amdgpu_bo_va_op(buf, 0, size, addr, 0, AMDGPU_VA_OP_MAP);
>>>>> + CU_ASSERT_EQUAL(r, 0);
>>>>> +
>>>>> + addr = dev_info.high_va_max - size;
>>>>> + r = amdgpu_bo_va_op(buf, 0, size, addr, 0, AMDGPU_VA_OP_MAP);
>>>>> + CU_ASSERT_EQUAL(r, 0);
>>>>> + }
>>>>> +
>>>>> + amdgpu_bo_free(buf);
>>>>> +}
>>>>> --
>>>>> 2.17.1
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> amd-gfx mailing list
>>>>> amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
>>>>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
More information about the amd-gfx
mailing list