[Nouveau] [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 08/17] drm/ttm: use gem vma_node
Thierry Reding
thierry.reding at gmail.com
Wed Aug 21 11:55:23 UTC 2019
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 04:33:58PM +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Aug 2019 at 20:14, Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > > > Changing the order doesn't look hard. Patch attached (untested, have no
> > > > test hardware). But maybe I missed some detail ...
> > >
> > > I came up with something very similar by splitting up nouveau_bo_new()
> > > into allocation and initialization steps, so that when necessary the GEM
> > > object can be initialized in between. I think that's slightly more
> > > flexible and easier to understand than a boolean flag.
> >
> > Yes, that should work too.
> >
> > Acked-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com>
> Acked-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com>
Thanks guys, applied to drm-misc-next.
Thierry
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/amd-gfx/attachments/20190821/be420548/attachment.sig>
More information about the amd-gfx
mailing list