[PATCH] drm/amd/powerplay: update cached feature enablement status V2
Quan, Evan
Evan.Quan at amd.com
Fri Aug 23 04:50:49 UTC 2019
Comment inline
From: Wang, Kevin(Yang) <Kevin1.Wang at amd.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2019 8:00 PM
To: Quan, Evan <Evan.Quan at amd.com>; amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amd/powerplay: update cached feature enablement status V2
comment inline.
________________________________
From: amd-gfx <amd-gfx-bounces at lists.freedesktop.org<mailto:amd-gfx-bounces at lists.freedesktop.org>> on behalf of Evan Quan <evan.quan at amd.com<mailto:evan.quan at amd.com>>
Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2019 6:18 PM
To: amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org<mailto:amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org> <amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org<mailto:amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org>>
Cc: Quan, Evan <Evan.Quan at amd.com<mailto:Evan.Quan at amd.com>>
Subject: [PATCH] drm/amd/powerplay: update cached feature enablement status V2
Need to update in cache feature enablement status after pp_feature
settings. Another fix for the commit below:
drm/amd/powerplay: implment sysfs feature status function in smu
V2: update smu_feature_update_enable_state() and relates
Change-Id: I90e29b0d839df26825d5993212f6097c7ad4bebf
[kevin]: this information is not neccessary for public, please remove it.
git config gerrit.createchangeid=false
Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan at amd.com<mailto:evan.quan at amd.com>>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/amdgpu_smu.c | 104 +++++++++---------
.../gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/inc/amdgpu_smu.h | 1 -
2 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/amdgpu_smu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/amdgpu_smu.c
index 4df7fb6eaf3c..3e1cd5d9c29e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/amdgpu_smu.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/amdgpu_smu.c
@@ -94,6 +94,55 @@ size_t smu_sys_get_pp_feature_mask(struct smu_context *smu, char *buf)
return size;
}
+static int smu_feature_update_enable_state(struct smu_context *smu,
+ uint64_t feature_mask,
+ bool enabled)
+{
+ struct smu_feature *feature = &smu->smu_feature;
+ uint32_t feature_low = 0, feature_high = 0;
+ uint64_t feature_id;
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ if (!smu->pm_enabled)
+ return ret;
+
+ feature_low = (feature_mask >> 0 ) & 0xffffffff;
+ feature_high = (feature_mask >> 32) & 0xffffffff;
+
+ if (enabled) {
+ ret = smu_send_smc_msg_with_param(smu, SMU_MSG_EnableSmuFeaturesLow,
+ feature_low);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ ret = smu_send_smc_msg_with_param(smu, SMU_MSG_EnableSmuFeaturesHigh,
+ feature_high);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ } else {
+ ret = smu_send_smc_msg_with_param(smu, SMU_MSG_DisableSmuFeaturesLow,
+ feature_low);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ ret = smu_send_smc_msg_with_param(smu, SMU_MSG_DisableSmuFeaturesHigh,
+ feature_high);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ mutex_lock(&feature->mutex);
+ for (feature_id = 0; feature_id < 64; feature_id++) {
+ if (feature_mask & (1ULL << feature_id)) {
+ if (enabled)
+ test_and_set_bit(feature_id, feature->enabled);
+ else
+ test_and_clear_bit(feature_id, feature->enabled);
+ }
+ }
//[kevin]: the code logic is a little redundant.
could you use bellow macro to replace that?
header : linux/bitmap.h
* bitmap_and(dst, src1, src2, nbits) *dst = *src1 & *src2
* bitmap_or(dst, src1, src2, nbits) *dst = *src1 | *src2
* bitmap_xor(dst, src1, src2, nbits) *dst = *src1 ^ *src2
* bitmap_andnot(dst, src1, src2, nbits) *dst = *src1 & ~(*src2)
+ mutex_unlock(&feature->mutex);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
[Quan, Evan] updated in v3.
int smu_sys_set_pp_feature_mask(struct smu_context *smu, uint64_t new_mask)
{
int ret = 0;
@@ -591,41 +640,7 @@ int smu_feature_init_dpm(struct smu_context *smu)
return ret;
}
[kevin]:
in this patch, i know you only want to fix not cached feature cache issue,
but in v2 patch,
the patch adjust the order of code functions, it seems that this is a brand new function,
I don't think it is necessary,
could you just reflect the modified content in the patch, which can facilitate us to trace problems and review.
thanks.
[Quan, Evan] Move the API before the place it's called. No problem here.
-int smu_feature_update_enable_state(struct smu_context *smu, uint64_t feature_mask, bool enabled)
-{
- uint32_t feature_low = 0, feature_high = 0;
- int ret = 0;
- if (!smu->pm_enabled)
- return ret;
-
- feature_low = (feature_mask >> 0 ) & 0xffffffff;
- feature_high = (feature_mask >> 32) & 0xffffffff;
-
- if (enabled) {
- ret = smu_send_smc_msg_with_param(smu, SMU_MSG_EnableSmuFeaturesLow,
- feature_low);
- if (ret)
- return ret;
- ret = smu_send_smc_msg_with_param(smu, SMU_MSG_EnableSmuFeaturesHigh,
- feature_high);
- if (ret)
- return ret;
-
- } else {
- ret = smu_send_smc_msg_with_param(smu, SMU_MSG_DisableSmuFeaturesLow,
- feature_low);
- if (ret)
- return ret;
- ret = smu_send_smc_msg_with_param(smu, SMU_MSG_DisableSmuFeaturesHigh,
- feature_high);
- if (ret)
- return ret;
-
- }
-
- return ret;
-}
int smu_feature_is_enabled(struct smu_context *smu, enum smu_feature_mask mask)
{
@@ -651,8 +666,6 @@ int smu_feature_set_enabled(struct smu_context *smu, enum smu_feature_mask mask,
{
struct smu_feature *feature = &smu->smu_feature;
int feature_id;
- uint64_t feature_mask = 0;
- int ret = 0;
feature_id = smu_feature_get_index(smu, mask);
if (feature_id < 0)
@@ -660,22 +673,9 @@ int smu_feature_set_enabled(struct smu_context *smu, enum smu_feature_mask mask,
WARN_ON(feature_id > feature->feature_num);
- feature_mask = 1ULL << feature_id;
-
- mutex_lock(&feature->mutex);
- ret = smu_feature_update_enable_state(smu, feature_mask, enable);
- if (ret)
- goto failed;
-
- if (enable)
- test_and_set_bit(feature_id, feature->enabled);
- else
- test_and_clear_bit(feature_id, feature->enabled);
-
-failed:
- mutex_unlock(&feature->mutex);
-
- return ret;
+ return smu_feature_update_enable_state(smu,
+ 1ULL << feature_id,
+ enable);
}
int smu_feature_is_supported(struct smu_context *smu, enum smu_feature_mask mask)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/inc/amdgpu_smu.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/inc/amdgpu_smu.h
index e80c81552d29..fbf68fd42b93 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/inc/amdgpu_smu.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/inc/amdgpu_smu.h
@@ -807,7 +807,6 @@ enum amd_dpm_forced_level smu_get_performance_level(struct smu_context *smu);
int smu_force_performance_level(struct smu_context *smu, enum amd_dpm_forced_level level);
int smu_set_display_count(struct smu_context *smu, uint32_t count);
bool smu_clk_dpm_is_enabled(struct smu_context *smu, enum smu_clk_type clk_type);
-int smu_feature_update_enable_state(struct smu_context *smu, uint64_t feature_mask, bool enabled);
const char *smu_get_message_name(struct smu_context *smu, enum smu_message_type type);
const char *smu_get_feature_name(struct smu_context *smu, enum smu_feature_mask feature);
size_t smu_sys_get_pp_feature_mask(struct smu_context *smu, char *buf);
--
2.23.0
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org<mailto:amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org>
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/amd-gfx/attachments/20190823/4627a496/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the amd-gfx
mailing list