[PATCH] drm/amdgpu/psp: keep TMR in visible vram region for SRIOV

Yin, Tianci (Rico) Tianci.Yin at amd.com
Wed Aug 28 11:44:08 UTC 2019


I checked the code, cpu pointer indeed only used for checking.

Thanks for your suggestions!

________________________________
From: Koenig, Christian <Christian.Koenig at amd.com>
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2019 19:08
To: Yin, Tianci (Rico) <Tianci.Yin at amd.com>
Cc: amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org <amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org>; Xu, Feifei <Feifei.Xu at amd.com>; Ma, Le <Le.Ma at amd.com>; Xiao, Jack <Jack.Xiao at amd.com>; Zhang, Hawking <Hawking.Zhang at amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu/psp: keep TMR in visible vram region for SRIOV

That's irrelevant in this case. CPU mapping's are destroyed automatically when the BO is freed.

Giving the CPU pointer to the free function is only for extra checking that we can't access it anymore.

Christian.

Am 28.08.2019 13:05 schrieb "Yin, Tianci (Rico)" <Tianci.Yin at amd.com>:
Might be better to use a local variable for the CPU pointer instead of
duplicating the calling parameters.

Local variable can't be used in cleaner.



________________________________
From: Christian König <ckoenig.leichtzumerken at gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2019 17:57
To: Yin, Tianci (Rico) <Tianci.Yin at amd.com>; amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org <amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Xu, Feifei <Feifei.Xu at amd.com>; Ma, Le <Le.Ma at amd.com>; Xiao, Jack <Jack.Xiao at amd.com>; Zhang, Hawking <Hawking.Zhang at amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu/psp: keep TMR in visible vram region for SRIOV

Am 28.08.19 um 11:25 schrieb Tianci Yin:
> From: "Tianci.Yin" <tianci.yin at amd.com>
>
> Fix compute ring test failure in sriov scenario.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tianci.Yin <tianci.yin at amd.com>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_psp.c | 14 ++++++++++----
>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_psp.h |  1 +
>   2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_psp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_psp.c
> index 9f7cc5b..92c68c9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_psp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_psp.c
> @@ -261,9 +261,15 @@ static int psp_tmr_init(struct psp_context *psp)
>                }
>        }
>
> -     ret = amdgpu_bo_create_kernel(psp->adev, tmr_size, PSP_TMR_SIZE,
> -                                   AMDGPU_GEM_DOMAIN_VRAM,
> -                                   &psp->tmr_bo, &psp->tmr_mc_addr, NULL);
> +     psp->tmr_buf = NULL;
> +     if (!amdgpu_sriov_vf(psp->adev))
> +             ret = amdgpu_bo_create_kernel(psp->adev, tmr_size, PSP_TMR_SIZE,
> +                                           AMDGPU_GEM_DOMAIN_VRAM,
> +                                           &psp->tmr_bo, &psp->tmr_mc_addr, NULL);
> +     else
> +             ret = amdgpu_bo_create_kernel(psp->adev, tmr_size, PSP_TMR_SIZE,
> +                                           AMDGPU_GEM_DOMAIN_VRAM,
> +                                           &psp->tmr_bo, &psp->tmr_mc_addr, &psp->tmr_buf);

Might be better to use a local variable for the CPU pointer instead of
duplicating the calling parameters.

BTW: How did you solved the stolen_vga_memory problem I pointed out in
the original patch set?

Christian.

>
>        return ret;
>   }
> @@ -1216,7 +1222,7 @@ static int psp_hw_fini(void *handle)
>
>        psp_ring_destroy(psp, PSP_RING_TYPE__KM);
>
> -     amdgpu_bo_free_kernel(&psp->tmr_bo, &psp->tmr_mc_addr, NULL);
> +     amdgpu_bo_free_kernel(&psp->tmr_bo, &psp->tmr_mc_addr, &psp->tmr_buf);
>        amdgpu_bo_free_kernel(&psp->fw_pri_bo,
>                              &psp->fw_pri_mc_addr, &psp->fw_pri_buf);
>        amdgpu_bo_free_kernel(&psp->fence_buf_bo,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_psp.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_psp.h
> index bc0947f..b73d4aa 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_psp.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_psp.h
> @@ -171,6 +171,7 @@ struct psp_context
>        /* tmr buffer */
>        struct amdgpu_bo                *tmr_bo;
>        uint64_t                        tmr_mc_addr;
> +     void                            *tmr_buf;
>
>        /* asd firmware and buffer */
>        const struct firmware           *asd_fw;

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/amd-gfx/attachments/20190828/9071ced9/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the amd-gfx mailing list