[PATCH] drm/amdgpu/powerplay: add missing breaks in polaris10_smumgr
Alex Deucher
alexdeucher at gmail.com
Mon Feb 18 22:35:46 UTC 2019
This was noticed by Gustavo and his -Wimplicit-fallthrough
patches. However, in this case, I believe we should have breaks
rather than falling though, that said, in practice we should
never fall through in the first place so there should be no
change in behavior.
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher at amd.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/smumgr/polaris10_smumgr.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/smumgr/polaris10_smumgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/smumgr/polaris10_smumgr.c
index 52abca065764..2d4cfe14f72e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/smumgr/polaris10_smumgr.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/smumgr/polaris10_smumgr.c
@@ -2330,6 +2330,7 @@ static uint32_t polaris10_get_offsetof(uint32_t type, uint32_t member)
case DRAM_LOG_BUFF_SIZE:
return offsetof(SMU74_SoftRegisters, DRAM_LOG_BUFF_SIZE);
}
+ break;
case SMU_Discrete_DpmTable:
switch (member) {
case UvdBootLevel:
@@ -2339,6 +2340,7 @@ static uint32_t polaris10_get_offsetof(uint32_t type, uint32_t member)
case LowSclkInterruptThreshold:
return offsetof(SMU74_Discrete_DpmTable, LowSclkInterruptThreshold);
}
+ break;
}
pr_warn("can't get the offset of type %x member %x\n", type, member);
return 0;
--
2.20.1
More information about the amd-gfx
mailing list