[PATCH] add missing mutex lock to amdgpu_get_xgmi_hive() (v2)
Grodzovsky, Andrey
Andrey.Grodzovsky at amd.com
Mon Jan 7 17:00:24 UTC 2019
On 01/07/2019 11:53 AM, StDenis, Tom wrote:
> On 2019-01-07 11:51 a.m., Grodzovsky, Andrey wrote:
>>
>> On 01/07/2019 11:36 AM, StDenis, Tom wrote:
>>> On 2019-01-07 11:33 a.m., Grodzovsky, Andrey wrote:
>>>> On 01/07/2019 11:16 AM, Liu, Shaoyun wrote:
>>>>> I think it's reasonable to use the hive specific lock for hive specific functions.
>>>>> The changes is acked-by Shaoyun.liu < Shaoyun.liu at amd.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: amd-gfx <amd-gfx-bounces at lists.freedesktop.org> On Behalf Of StDenis, Tom
>>>>> Sent: Monday, January 7, 2019 10:16 AM
>>>>> To: amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
>>>>> Cc: StDenis, Tom <Tom.StDenis at amd.com>
>>>>> Subject: [PATCH] add missing mutex lock to amdgpu_get_xgmi_hive() (v2)
>>>>>
>>>>> v2: Move locks around in other functions so that this function can stand on its own. Also only hold the hive specific lock for add/remove device instead of the driver global lock so you can't add/remove devices in parallel from one hive.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Tom St Denis <tom.stdenis at amd.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c | 2 +-
>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_xgmi.c | 36 ++++++++++++++--------
>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_xgmi.h | 2 +-
>>>>> 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
>>>>> index 39d5d058b2c7..13d8e2ad2f7a 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
>>>>> @@ -3525,7 +3525,7 @@ int amdgpu_device_gpu_recover(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
>>>>> * by different nodes. No point also since the one node already executing
>>>>> * reset will also reset all the other nodes in the hive.
>>>>> */
>>>>> - hive = amdgpu_get_xgmi_hive(adev);
>>>>> + hive = amdgpu_get_xgmi_hive(adev, 0);
>>>>> if (hive && adev->gmc.xgmi.num_physical_nodes > 1 &&
>>>>> !mutex_trylock(&hive->hive_lock))
>>>>> return 0;
>>>> Let's say i have device 0 in hive A and it just got a gpu reset and at
>>>> the same time device 1 is being added to same have though
>>>> amdgpu_xgmi_add_device, hive->hive_lock is acquired by this new device
>>>> being added and so gpu reset for device 0 bails out on
>>>> '!mutex_trylock(&hive->hive_lock))' without completing the reset.
>>>> Also in general i feel a bit uncomfortable about the confusing
>>>> acquisition scheme in the function and the fact that you take the
>>>> hive->hive_lock inside amdgpu_get_xgmi_hive but release is still outside
>>>> of the function.
>>> Is adding a device while resetting a device even a valid operation
>>> anyways?
>> In theory it's valid if you have hot pluggable devices
>>> I think this means more so that the reset logic is broken. Instead
>>> there should be a per-hive reset lock that is taken and that is tested
>>> instead.
>>>
>>> Tom
>> The hive->hive_lock was added exactly for this purpose and used only for
>> that purpose. Maybe the naming i gave it wasn't reflective of it's
>> purpose :)
>
> But the add/remove should use per-hive locks not the global lock... :-)
>
> (I'm honestly not trying to bike shed I just thought the get_hive
> function looked wrong :-)).
>
> Tom
Totally agree with you, if Shayun (who origianlly added the global
xgmi_mutex) is fine with switching to per hive mutex then me too, I just
point out the problem with gpu reset and as you said we then need to
rename the existing hive_lock into reset_lock and then and another per
hive lock to do what you propose. Also - is there a way to not take the
hive lock inside amdgpu_get_xgmi_hive but release it outside ? AFAIK
it's an opening for problems where people use it but forget to call
release.
Andrey
> _______________________________________________
> amd-gfx mailing list
> amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
More information about the amd-gfx
mailing list