[PATCH 17/25] drm/amd/display: dal-pplib interface refactor dal part
sunpeng.li at amd.com
sunpeng.li at amd.com
Tue Jan 8 16:28:19 UTC 2019
From: hersen wu <hersenxs.wu at amd.com>
[WHY] clarify dal input parameters to pplib interface, remove
un-used parameters. dal knows exactly which parameters needed
and their effects at pplib and smu sides.
current dal sequence for dcn1_update_clock to pplib:
1.smu10_display_clock_voltage_request for dcefclk
2.smu10_display_clock_voltage_request for fclk
3.phm_store_dal_configuration_data {
set_min_deep_sleep_dcfclk
set_active_display_count
store_cc6_data --- this data never be referenced
new sequence will be:
1. set_display_count --- need add new pplib interface
2. set_min_deep_sleep_dcfclk -- new pplib interface
3. set_hard_min_dcfclk_by_freq
4. set_hard_min_fclk_by_freq
after this code refactor, smu10_display_clock_voltage_request,
phm_store_dal_configuration_data will not be needed for rv.
Signed-off-by: hersen wu <hersenxs.wu at amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Harry Wentland <Harry.Wentland at amd.com>
Acked-by: Leo Li <sunpeng.li at amd.com>
---
.../drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_pp_smu.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 57 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_pp_smu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_pp_smu.c
index 9d2d698..e8e9eeb 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_pp_smu.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_pp_smu.c
@@ -559,6 +559,58 @@ void pp_rv_set_pme_wa_enable(struct pp_smu *pp)
pp_funcs->notify_smu_enable_pwe(pp_handle);
}
+void pp_rv_set_active_display_count(struct pp_smu *pp, int count)
+{
+ const struct dc_context *ctx = pp->dm;
+ struct amdgpu_device *adev = ctx->driver_context;
+ void *pp_handle = adev->powerplay.pp_handle;
+ const struct amd_pm_funcs *pp_funcs = adev->powerplay.pp_funcs;
+
+ if (!pp_funcs || !pp_funcs->set_active_display_count)
+ return;
+
+ pp_funcs->set_active_display_count(pp_handle, count);
+}
+
+void pp_rv_set_min_deep_sleep_dcfclk(struct pp_smu *pp, int clock)
+{
+ const struct dc_context *ctx = pp->dm;
+ struct amdgpu_device *adev = ctx->driver_context;
+ void *pp_handle = adev->powerplay.pp_handle;
+ const struct amd_pm_funcs *pp_funcs = adev->powerplay.pp_funcs;
+
+ if (!pp_funcs || !pp_funcs->set_min_deep_sleep_dcefclk)
+ return;
+
+ pp_funcs->set_min_deep_sleep_dcefclk(pp_handle, clock);
+}
+
+void pp_rv_set_hard_min_dcefclk_by_freq(struct pp_smu *pp, int clock)
+{
+ const struct dc_context *ctx = pp->dm;
+ struct amdgpu_device *adev = ctx->driver_context;
+ void *pp_handle = adev->powerplay.pp_handle;
+ const struct amd_pm_funcs *pp_funcs = adev->powerplay.pp_funcs;
+
+ if (!pp_funcs || !pp_funcs->set_hard_min_dcefclk_by_freq)
+ return;
+
+ pp_funcs->set_hard_min_dcefclk_by_freq(pp_handle, clock);
+}
+
+void pp_rv_set_hard_min_fclk_by_freq(struct pp_smu *pp, int mhz)
+{
+ const struct dc_context *ctx = pp->dm;
+ struct amdgpu_device *adev = ctx->driver_context;
+ void *pp_handle = adev->powerplay.pp_handle;
+ const struct amd_pm_funcs *pp_funcs = adev->powerplay.pp_funcs;
+
+ if (!pp_funcs || !pp_funcs->set_hard_min_fclk_by_freq)
+ return;
+
+ pp_funcs->set_hard_min_fclk_by_freq(pp_handle, mhz);
+}
+
void dm_pp_get_funcs_rv(
struct dc_context *ctx,
struct pp_smu_funcs_rv *funcs)
@@ -567,4 +619,9 @@ void dm_pp_get_funcs_rv(
funcs->set_display_requirement = pp_rv_set_display_requirement;
funcs->set_wm_ranges = pp_rv_set_wm_ranges;
funcs->set_pme_wa_enable = pp_rv_set_pme_wa_enable;
+ funcs->set_display_count = pp_rv_set_active_display_count;
+ funcs->set_min_deep_sleep_dcfclk = pp_rv_set_min_deep_sleep_dcfclk;
+ funcs->set_hard_min_dcfclk_by_freq = pp_rv_set_hard_min_dcefclk_by_freq;
+ funcs->set_hard_min_fclk_by_freq = pp_rv_set_hard_min_fclk_by_freq;
}
+
--
2.7.4
More information about the amd-gfx
mailing list