[PATCH] drm/amd/display: Pass app_tf by value rather than by reference
Nathan Chancellor
natechancellor at gmail.com
Sat Jan 26 03:42:14 UTC 2019
On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 08:09:00PM +0000, Wentland, Harry wrote:
> On 2018-12-11 5:07 p.m., Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 1:42 PM Nathan Chancellor
> > <natechancellor at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 01:25:00PM -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 3:42 PM Nathan Chancellor
> >>> <natechancellor at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Clang warns when an expression that equals zero is used as a null
> >>>> pointer constant (in lieu of NULL):
> >>>>
> >>>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c:4435:3:
> >>>> warning: expression which evaluates to zero treated as a null pointer
> >>>> constant of type 'const enum color_transfer_func *'
> >>>> [-Wnon-literal-null-conversion]
> >>>> TRANSFER_FUNC_UNKNOWN,
> >>>> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >>>> 1 warning generated.
> >>>>
> >>>> This warning is caused by commit bb47de736661 ("drm/amdgpu: Set FreeSync
> >>>> state using drm VRR properties") and it could be solved by using NULL
> >>>> instead of TRANSFER_FUNC_UNKNOWN or casting TRANSFER_FUNC_UNKNOWN as a
> >>>> pointer. However, after looking into it, there doesn't appear to be a
> >>>> good reason to pass app_tf by reference as it is never mutated along the
> >>>> way. This is the only code path in which app_tf is used:
> >>>>
> >>>> mod_freesync_build_vrr_infopacket ->
> >>>> build_vrr_infopacket_v2 ->
> >>>> build_vrr_infopacket_fs2_data
> >>>>
> >>>> Neither mod_freesync_build_vrr_infopacket or build_vrr_infopacket_v2
> >>>> modify app_tf's value and build_vrr_infopacket_fs2_data expects just
> >>>> the value so we can avoid dereferencing anything by just passing in
> >>>> app_tf's value to mod_freesync_build_vrr_infopacket and
> >>>> build_vrr_infopacket_v2.
> >>>>
> >>>> There is no functional change because build_vrr_infopacket_fs2_data
> >>>> doesn't do anything if TRANSFER_FUNC_UNKNOWN is passed to it, the same
> >>>> as not calling build_vrr_infopacket_fs2_data at all like before this
> >>>> change when NULL was used for app_tf.
> >>>
> >>> Nathan,
> >>> Thanks for sending this patch. I was hoping to provide review sooner,
> >>> but have been quite busy lately.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Late review is better than no review, I appeciate you taking the time to
> >> do this!
> >>
> >>> Yeah, especially for LP64 targets, the pointer to enum is larger than
> >>> just the enum, and if it's not being updated ("in/out paramter")
> >>> there's no need to pass by pointer.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Thanks for confirming!
> >>
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor at gmail.com>
> >>>> ---
> >>>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/modules/freesync/freesync.c | 7 +++----
> >>>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/modules/inc/mod_freesync.h | 2 +-
> >>>> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/modules/freesync/freesync.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/modules/freesync/freesync.c
> >>>> index 620a171620ee..520665a9d81a 100644
> >>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/modules/freesync/freesync.c
> >>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/modules/freesync/freesync.c
> >>>> @@ -656,7 +656,7 @@ static void build_vrr_infopacket_v1(enum signal_type signal,
> >>>>
> >>>> static void build_vrr_infopacket_v2(enum signal_type signal,
> >>>> const struct mod_vrr_params *vrr,
> >>>> - const enum color_transfer_func *app_tf,
> >>>> + enum color_transfer_func app_tf,
> >>>> struct dc_info_packet *infopacket)
> >>>> {
> >>>> unsigned int payload_size = 0;
> >>>> @@ -664,8 +664,7 @@ static void build_vrr_infopacket_v2(enum signal_type signal,
> >>>> build_vrr_infopacket_header_v2(signal, infopacket, &payload_size);
> >>>> build_vrr_infopacket_data(vrr, infopacket);
> >>>>
> >>>> - if (app_tf != NULL)
> >>>> - build_vrr_infopacket_fs2_data(*app_tf, infopacket);
> >>>> + build_vrr_infopacket_fs2_data(app_tf, infopacket);
> >>>>
> >>>> build_vrr_infopacket_checksum(&payload_size, infopacket);
> >>>>
> >>>> @@ -676,7 +675,7 @@ void mod_freesync_build_vrr_infopacket(struct mod_freesync *mod_freesync,
> >>>> const struct dc_stream_state *stream,
> >>>> const struct mod_vrr_params *vrr,
> >>>> enum vrr_packet_type packet_type,
> >>>> - const enum color_transfer_func *app_tf,
> >>>> + enum color_transfer_func app_tf,
> >>>> struct dc_info_packet *infopacket)
> >>>> {
> >>>> /* SPD info packet for FreeSync */
> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/modules/inc/mod_freesync.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/modules/inc/mod_freesync.h
> >>>> index 949a8b62aa98..063af6258fd9 100644
> >>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/modules/inc/mod_freesync.h
> >>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/modules/inc/mod_freesync.h
> >>>> @@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ void mod_freesync_build_vrr_infopacket(struct mod_freesync *mod_freesync,
> >>>> const struct dc_stream_state *stream,
> >>>> const struct mod_vrr_params *vrr,
> >>>> enum vrr_packet_type packet_type,
> >>>> - const enum color_transfer_func *app_tf,
> >>>> + enum color_transfer_func app_tf,
> >>>
> >>> Don't you need to update the callsite of `mod_freesync_build_vrr_infopacket` in
> >>>
> >>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c#4949:
> >>>
> >>> - NULL,
> >>> + transfer_func_unknown,
> >>>
> >>
> >> That change in commit bb47de736661 ("drm/amdgpu: Set FreeSync state
> >> using drm VRR properties") in -next is what prompted this patch (the
> >> warning in the commit message is not present in mainline):
> >
> > Ah! Sorry, I was looking at mainline. I should have noticed
> > bb47de736661 wasn't there.
> >
> > Shouldn't that change fail to compile, as transfer_func_unknown is an
> > `enum color_transfer_func` value, but
> > mod_freesync_build_vrr_infopacket takes a *pointer* to an `enum
> > color_transfer_func` value?
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/modules/freesync/freesync.c#n675
> >
> >>
> >> mod_freesync_build_vrr_infopacket(
> >> dm->freesync_module,
> >> new_stream,
> >> &vrr,
> >> packet_type_vrr,
> >> transfer_func_unknown,
> >> &vrr_infopacket);
> >>
> >>> Maybe at that point the `if (app_tf != NULL)` could be replaced with
> >>> `if (app_tf != transfer_func_unknown)` hoisted from
> >>> `build_vrr_infopacket_fs2_data`? (There's only one caller of
> >>> `build_vrr_infopacket_fs2_data` today, maybe fine to leave the
> >>> unconditional call and check).
> >>>
> >>
> >> Hmmm that's not unreasonable I suppose. I guess it depends on if
> >> build_vrr_infopacket_fs2_data could ever be called from outside of
> >> build_vrr_infopacket_v2; if it can, it makes sense to leave the
> >> conditional check for 'app_tf != transfer_func_unknown' in
> >> build_vrr_infopacket_fs2_data and leaving the unconditional call
> >> to it in build_vrr_infopacket_v2 (since app_tf is no longer a pointer,
> >> no need to check against NULL).
> >>
> >> I'm happy to do a v2 if the maintainers feel strongly about it, thank
> >> you for bringing that up.
> >
> > Don't worry about it, I think it's fine.
> > Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers at google.com>
> >
>
> Sorry for being late to the game. FWIW, code is also
> Reviewed-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland at amd.com>
>
> We can change the comparison separately later.
>
> Not sure why this was ever passed as a pointer.
>
> Harry
Thanks Harry, could you (or someone) pick this up? This warning is now in mainline.
Nathan
More information about the amd-gfx
mailing list