[PATCH] drm/syncobj: fix leaking dma_fence in drm_syncobj_query_ioctl
Christian König
ckoenig.leichtzumerken at gmail.com
Mon Jul 22 13:21:24 UTC 2019
Am 22.07.19 um 15:16 schrieb Lionel Landwerlin:
> On 22/07/2019 15:59, Christian König wrote:
>> We need to check the context number instead if the previous sequence
>> to detect
>> an error and if an error is detected we need to drop the reference to
>> the
>> current fence or otherwise would leak it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com>
>
> Fixes: 27b575a9aa2f ("drm/syncobj: add timeline payload query ioctl v6")
> Reviewed-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin at intel.com>
CC stable? I'm not sure when this got upstream.
Christian.
>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_syncobj.c | 10 +++++-----
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_syncobj.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_syncobj.c
>> index 75cb4bb7619e..1438dcb3ebb1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_syncobj.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_syncobj.c
>> @@ -1298,14 +1298,14 @@ int drm_syncobj_query_ioctl(struct drm_device
>> *dev, void *data,
>> struct dma_fence *iter, *last_signaled = NULL;
>> dma_fence_chain_for_each(iter, fence) {
>> - if (!iter)
>> - break;
>> - dma_fence_put(last_signaled);
>> - last_signaled = dma_fence_get(iter);
>> - if (!to_dma_fence_chain(last_signaled)->prev_seqno)
>> + if (iter->context != fence->context) {
>> + dma_fence_put(iter);
>> /* It is most likely that timeline has
>> * unorder points. */
>> break;
>> + }
>> + dma_fence_put(last_signaled);
>> + last_signaled = dma_fence_get(iter);
>> }
>> point = dma_fence_is_signaled(last_signaled) ?
>> last_signaled->seqno :
>
>
More information about the amd-gfx
mailing list