[PATCH] drm/amdgpu: Add GDS clearing workaround in later init for gfx9
Christian König
ckoenig.leichtzumerken at gmail.com
Sat Jun 8 12:50:09 UTC 2019
Yeah, that would be a good idea as well.
Additional to that I suggest to update GDS_VMID0_BASE/_SIZE with direct
register writes instead of PM4 packets.
Christian.
Am 07.06.19 um 22:16 schrieb Shamis, Leonid:
> James,
>
> Do you set GDS_VMID0_BASE to 0?.. I don't see it in your patch.
>
> Regards,
> Leonid
>
> On 2019-06-07, 15:42, "Zhu, James" <James.Zhu at amd.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 2019-06-07 3:12 p.m., Zhu, James wrote:
> > On 2019-06-07 2:16 p.m., Alex Deucher wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 12:38 PM Zhu, James <James.Zhu at amd.com> wrote:
> >>> Since Hardware bug, GDS exist ECC error after cold boot up,
> >>> adding GDS clearing workaround in later init for gfx9.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: James Zhu <James.Zhu at amd.com>
> >>> ---
> >>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>> 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c
> >>> index 76722fc..81f6ba8 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c
> >>> @@ -3634,6 +3634,50 @@ static const struct soc15_reg_entry sec_ded_counter_registers[] = {
> >>> { SOC15_REG_ENTRY(GC, 0, mmSQC_EDC_CNT3), 0, 4, 6},
> >>> };
> >>>
> >>> +
> >>> +static int gfx_v9_0_do_edc_gds_workarounds(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
> >>> +{
> >>> + struct amdgpu_ring *ring = &adev->gfx.compute_ring[0];
> >>> + int r;
> >>> +
> >>> + r = amdgpu_ring_alloc(ring, 17);
> >>> + if (r) {
> >>> + DRM_ERROR("amdgpu: GDS workarounds failed to lock ring %s (%d).\n",
> >>> + ring->name, r);
> >>> + return r;
> >>> + }
> >>> +
> >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, PACKET3(PACKET3_WRITE_DATA, 3));
> >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, WRITE_DATA_ENGINE_SEL(0) |
> >>> + WRITE_DATA_DST_SEL(0));
> >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, SOC15_REG_OFFSET(GC, 0, mmGDS_VMID0_SIZE));
> >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, 0);
> >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, 0x10000);
> >> hardcoded size, please use the size from the driver.
> >>
> >>> +
> >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, PACKET3(PACKET3_DMA_DATA, 5));
> >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, (PACKET3_DMA_DATA_CP_SYNC |
> >>> + PACKET3_DMA_DATA_DST_SEL(1) |
> >>> + PACKET3_DMA_DATA_SRC_SEL(2) |
> >>> + PACKET3_DMA_DATA_ENGINE(0)));
> >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, 0);
> >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, 0);
> >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, 0);
> >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, 0);
> >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, PACKET3_DMA_DATA_CMD_RAW_WAIT | 0x10000);
> >> Instead of hardcoding the size, can you use the gds size from the
> >> driver (adev->gds.gds_size).
> > Hi Alex,
> >
> > Do you mean adev->gds.mem.total_size?
> >
> > But I see below operation in gfx_v9_0_ngg_init.
> >
> > adev->gds.mem.total_size -= ....
> >
> > Or you want me to add gds_size in struct amdgpu_gds?
> >
> > James
>
> Yeah, The amd-staging-drm-next branch has adev->gds.gds_size.
>
> James
>
> >
> >> With that fixed:
> >> Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher at amd.com>
> >>
> >>> +
> >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, PACKET3(PACKET3_WRITE_DATA, 3));
> >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, WRITE_DATA_ENGINE_SEL(0) |
> >>> + WRITE_DATA_DST_SEL(0));
> >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, SOC15_REG_OFFSET(GC, 0, mmGDS_VMID0_SIZE));
> >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, 0);
> >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, 0x0);
> >>> +
> >>> + amdgpu_ring_commit(ring);
> >>> +
> >>> + return 0;
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +
> >>> static int gfx_v9_0_do_edc_gpr_workarounds(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
> >>> {
> >>> struct amdgpu_ring *ring = &adev->gfx.compute_ring[0];
> >>> @@ -3810,6 +3854,10 @@ static int gfx_v9_0_ecc_late_init(void *handle)
> >>> return 0;
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> + r = gfx_v9_0_do_edc_gds_workarounds(adev);
> >>> + if (r)
> >>> + return r;
> >>> +
> >>> /* requires IBs so do in late init after IB pool is initialized */
> >>> r = gfx_v9_0_do_edc_gpr_workarounds(adev);
> >>> if (r)
> >>> --
> >>> 2.7.4
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> amd-gfx mailing list
> >>> amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> >>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> amd-gfx mailing list
> amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
More information about the amd-gfx
mailing list