[PATCH v3 hmm 09/12] mm/hmm: Poison hmm_range during unregister
Jason Gunthorpe
jgg at ziepe.ca
Tue Jun 18 18:04:22 UTC 2019
On Sat, Jun 15, 2019 at 07:17:26AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > - /* Sanity check this really should not happen. */
> > - if (hmm == NULL || range->end <= range->start)
> > - return;
> > -
> > mutex_lock(&hmm->lock);
> > list_del_rcu(&range->list);
> > mutex_unlock(&hmm->lock);
> >
> > /* Drop reference taken by hmm_range_register() */
> > - range->valid = false;
> > mmput(hmm->mm);
> > hmm_put(hmm);
> > - range->hmm = NULL;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * The range is now invalid and the ref on the hmm is dropped, so
> > + * poison the pointer. Leave other fields in place, for the caller's
> > + * use.
> > + */
> > + range->valid = false;
> > + memset(&range->hmm, POISON_INUSE, sizeof(range->hmm));
>
> Formatting seems to be messed up. But again I don't see the value
> in the poisoning, just let normal linked list debugging do its work.
> The other cleanups looks fine to me.
tabs vs spaces, I fixed it. This one is more murky than the other - it
is to prevent the caller from using any of the range APIs after the
range is unregistered, but we could also safely use NULL here, I
think.
Jason
More information about the amd-gfx
mailing list