[PATCH] drm/amdgpu: revert "XGMI pstate switch initial support"
Koenig, Christian
Christian.Koenig at amd.com
Tue Mar 19 16:09:02 UTC 2019
Am 19.03.19 um 16:42 schrieb Liu, Shaoyun:
> Thanks Felix .
>
> We did consider to put the logic into bo_add/bo_rmv, but Felix pointed
> out the object can be migrate from FB to system memory after allocation
> .
Yeah, I also considered that and that is actually a really good argument.
But even in this case you still only need the flag in the bo_va
structure, not the mapping.
> I also think of put the logic inside amdgpu_vm_bo_update_mapping ,
> but seems that function prefer to take the dma address already been
> calculated (change that will cause a huge code reorganize) . That's the
> reason I put the logic before calling into amdgpu_vm_bo_update_mapping .
Both places won't work correctly. The problem is simply that you haven't
considered what happens when the VM is destroyed.
In this case we should not unmap the XGMI mapping, but rather just throw
away the page tables completely.
Additional to that the mapping code is often interrupted because the
calling process receives a signal. So it can happen that all of that is
called multiple times. The is_xgmi variable prevents that, but that's
really not straight forward.
Se the PRT handling for how complicated that gets when you attach
something like this to the mapping. IIRC we have 3 different code paths
how a PRT mapping can end up being destroyed including a delayed destroy
handler and callback.
>
> As the race condition you described sounds reasonable. let me think
> how to fix it .
Two possible code pattern usually used for this:
A) You have a lock protecting both the counter as well as the operation:
lock();
if (increment_and_test_counter())
power_on()
unlock();
lock()
if (decrement_and_test_counter())
power_off();
unlock();
B) The counter is an atomic and you have a lock protecting the operation:
if (atomic_inc_return() == 1) {
lock();
power_on();
unlock();
}
if (atomic_dec_return() == 0) {
lock();
if (double_check_atomic_for_race())
power_off();
unlock();
}
The later is more efficient, but also more work to implement.
Either way I suggest to move the actual increment/decrement into the
xgmi code and only have the signalling in the VM code.
Regards,
Christian.
>
> Regards
>
> shaoyun.liu
>
> On 2019-03-19 9:10 a.m., Kuehling, Felix wrote:
>> On 3/19/2019 8:49 AM, Christian König wrote:
>>> Yeah, all that is perfectly fine.
>>>
>>> The problem is Shaoyun didn't put this into the mapping code, but
>>> rather into the VM state machine. So this won't work at all (the
>>> counter and increment/decrement unbalanced and multiple times).
>> We tried to consider all the possible ways that this could go wrong.
>> Basically, every time a mapping is updated, we update the is_xgmi state
>> and update the counter if it changed. Have you seen the counter become
>> unbalanced?
>>
>>
>>> The correct place to add this is amdgpu_vm_bo_add/amdgpu_vm_bo_rmv.
>> I think we considered that. The problem is that a BO can be migrated
>> between bo_add and bo_rmv. I found that even bo->preferred_domain can
>> change with AMDGPU_GEM_OP_SET_PLACEMENT. So you can't reliably know
>> whether to increment your counter, and your counter can become
>> unbalanced if a migration or AMDGPU_GEM_OP_SET_PLACEMENT happens between
>> bo_add and bo_rmv.
>>
>> Therefore we're trying to check for XGMI mappings every time the mapping
>> changes and keep track of the state in amdgpu_bo_va_mapping.
>>
>>
>>> Additional to that the approach with the counter doesn't work because
>>> you don't have a lock protecting the hw update itself. E.g. while
>>> powering down you can add a mapping which needs to power it up again
>>> and so powering down and powering up race with each other.
>> That's a good point.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Felix
>>
>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Christian.
>>>
>>> Am 19.03.19 um 13:42 schrieb Kuehling, Felix:
>>>> We discussed a few different approaches before settling on this one.
>>>>
>>>> Maybe it needs some more background. XGMI links are quite power hungry.
>>>> Being able to power them down improves performance for power-limited
>>>> workloads that don't need XGMI. In machine learning, pretty much all
>>>> workloads are power limited on our GPUs, so this is not just a
>>>> theoretical thing. The problem is, how do you know whether you need
>>>> XGMI? You need to know whether there are P2P memory mappings involving
>>>> XGMI. So the natural place to put that is in the memory mapping code.
>>>>
>>>> If you do spot a race condition in the code, let's talk about how to
>>>> fix it.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Felix
>>>>
>>>> On 3/19/2019 8:07 AM, Christian König wrote:
>>>>> This reverts commit c9115f8904eef0f880d3b4f8306f553b1bb1c532.
>>>>>
>>>>> Adding this to the mapping is complete nonsense and the whole
>>>>> implementation looks racy. This patch wasn't thoughtfully reviewed
>>>>> and should be reverted for now.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h | 3 ---
>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c | 3 ---
>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.h | 1 -
>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c | 29
>>>>> +---------------------
>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_xgmi.c | 15 -----------
>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_xgmi.h | 2 --
>>>>> 6 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 52 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h
>>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h
>>>>> index b5720c1610e1..1db192150532 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h
>>>>> @@ -931,9 +931,6 @@ struct amdgpu_device {
>>>>> int asic_reset_res;
>>>>> struct work_struct xgmi_reset_work;
>>>>> - /* counter of mapped memory through xgmi */
>>>>> - atomic_t xgmi_map_counter;
>>>>> -
>>>>> bool in_baco_reset;
>>>>> };
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
>>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
>>>>> index 964a4d3f1f43..206583707124 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
>>>>> @@ -2018,9 +2018,6 @@ static void
>>>>> amdgpu_device_ip_late_init_func_handler(struct work_struct *work)
>>>>> r = amdgpu_device_enable_mgpu_fan_boost();
>>>>> if (r)
>>>>> DRM_ERROR("enable mgpu fan boost failed (%d).\n", r);
>>>>> -
>>>>> - /*set to low pstate by default */
>>>>> - amdgpu_xgmi_set_pstate(adev, 0);
>>>>> }
>>>>> static void amdgpu_device_delay_enable_gfx_off(struct
>>>>> work_struct *work)
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.h
>>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.h
>>>>> index 6f176bbe4cf2..220a6a7b1bc1 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.h
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.h
>>>>> @@ -54,7 +54,6 @@ struct amdgpu_bo_va_mapping {
>>>>> uint64_t __subtree_last;
>>>>> uint64_t offset;
>>>>> uint64_t flags;
>>>>> - bool is_xgmi;
>>>>> };
>>>>> /* User space allocated BO in a VM */
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c
>>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c
>>>>> index c5230a9fb7f6..c8f0e4ca05fb 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c
>>>>> @@ -34,7 +34,6 @@
>>>>> #include "amdgpu_trace.h"
>>>>> #include "amdgpu_amdkfd.h"
>>>>> #include "amdgpu_gmc.h"
>>>>> -#include "amdgpu_xgmi.h"
>>>>> /**
>>>>> * DOC: GPUVM
>>>>> @@ -2022,9 +2021,8 @@ int amdgpu_vm_bo_update(struct amdgpu_device
>>>>> *adev,
>>>>> struct ttm_mem_reg *mem;
>>>>> struct drm_mm_node *nodes;
>>>>> struct dma_fence *exclusive, **last_update;
>>>>> - struct amdgpu_device *bo_adev = adev;
>>>>> - bool is_xgmi = false;
>>>>> uint64_t flags;
>>>>> + struct amdgpu_device *bo_adev = adev;
>>>>> int r;
>>>>> if (clear || !bo) {
>>>>> @@ -2046,10 +2044,6 @@ int amdgpu_vm_bo_update(struct amdgpu_device
>>>>> *adev,
>>>>> if (bo) {
>>>>> flags = amdgpu_ttm_tt_pte_flags(adev, bo->tbo.ttm, mem);
>>>>> bo_adev = amdgpu_ttm_adev(bo->tbo.bdev);
>>>>> - if (adev != bo_adev &&
>>>>> - adev->gmc.xgmi.hive_id &&
>>>>> - adev->gmc.xgmi.hive_id == bo_adev->gmc.xgmi.hive_id)
>>>>> - is_xgmi = true;
>>>>> } else {
>>>>> flags = 0x0;
>>>>> }
>>>>> @@ -2068,19 +2062,6 @@ int amdgpu_vm_bo_update(struct amdgpu_device
>>>>> *adev,
>>>>> }
>>>>> list_for_each_entry(mapping, &bo_va->invalids, list) {
>>>>> - if (mapping->is_xgmi != is_xgmi) {
>>>>> - if (is_xgmi) {
>>>>> - /* Adding an XGMI mapping to the PT */
>>>>> - if (atomic_inc_return(&adev->xgmi_map_counter) == 1)
>>>>> - amdgpu_xgmi_set_pstate(adev, 1);
>>>>> - } else {
>>>>> - /* Removing an XGMI mapping from the PT */
>>>>> - if (atomic_dec_return(&adev->xgmi_map_counter) == 0)
>>>>> - amdgpu_xgmi_set_pstate(adev, 0);
>>>>> - }
>>>>> - mapping->is_xgmi = is_xgmi;
>>>>> - }
>>>>> -
>>>>> r = amdgpu_vm_bo_split_mapping(adev, exclusive,
>>>>> pages_addr, vm,
>>>>> mapping, flags, bo_adev, nodes,
>>>>> last_update);
>>>>> @@ -2298,13 +2279,6 @@ int amdgpu_vm_clear_freed(struct
>>>>> amdgpu_device *adev,
>>>>> r = amdgpu_vm_bo_update_mapping(adev, NULL, NULL, vm,
>>>>> mapping->start, mapping->last,
>>>>> init_pte_value, 0, &f);
>>>>> -
>>>>> - if (mapping->is_xgmi) {
>>>>> - /* Removing an XGMI mapping from the PT */
>>>>> - if (atomic_dec_return(&adev->xgmi_map_counter) == 0)
>>>>> - amdgpu_xgmi_set_pstate(adev, 0);
>>>>> - }
>>>>> -
>>>>> amdgpu_vm_free_mapping(adev, vm, mapping, f);
>>>>> if (r) {
>>>>> dma_fence_put(f);
>>>>> @@ -2501,7 +2475,6 @@ int amdgpu_vm_bo_map(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
>>>>> mapping->last = eaddr;
>>>>> mapping->offset = offset;
>>>>> mapping->flags = flags;
>>>>> - mapping->is_xgmi = false;
>>>>> amdgpu_vm_bo_insert_map(adev, bo_va, mapping);
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_xgmi.c
>>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_xgmi.c
>>>>> index 807440d3edff..fcc4b05c745c 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_xgmi.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_xgmi.c
>>>>> @@ -200,7 +200,6 @@ struct amdgpu_hive_info
>>>>> *amdgpu_get_xgmi_hive(struct amdgpu_device *adev, int lo
>>>>> if (lock)
>>>>> mutex_lock(&tmp->hive_lock);
>>>>> - tmp->pstate = -1;
>>>>> mutex_unlock(&xgmi_mutex);
>>>>> @@ -322,17 +321,3 @@ void amdgpu_xgmi_remove_device(struct
>>>>> amdgpu_device *adev)
>>>>> mutex_unlock(&hive->hive_lock);
>>>>> }
>>>>> }
>>>>> -
>>>>> -int amdgpu_xgmi_set_pstate(struct amdgpu_device *adev, int pstate)
>>>>> -{
>>>>> - int ret = 0;
>>>>> - struct amdgpu_hive_info *hive = amdgpu_get_xgmi_hive(adev, 0);
>>>>> -
>>>>> - if (!hive)
>>>>> - return 0;
>>>>> -
>>>>> - if (hive->pstate == pstate)
>>>>> - return 0;
>>>>> - /* Todo : sent the message to SMU for pstate change */
>>>>> - return ret;
>>>>> -}
>>>>> \ No newline at end of file
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_xgmi.h
>>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_xgmi.h
>>>>> index 7e1710fcbef2..24a3b0362f98 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_xgmi.h
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_xgmi.h
>>>>> @@ -33,13 +33,11 @@ struct amdgpu_hive_info {
>>>>> struct kobject *kobj;
>>>>> struct device_attribute dev_attr;
>>>>> struct amdgpu_device *adev;
>>>>> - int pstate; /*0 -- low , 1 -- high , -1 unknown*/
>>>>> };
>>>>> struct amdgpu_hive_info *amdgpu_get_xgmi_hive(struct
>>>>> amdgpu_device *adev, int lock);
>>>>> int amdgpu_xgmi_update_topology(struct amdgpu_hive_info *hive,
>>>>> struct amdgpu_device *adev);
>>>>> int amdgpu_xgmi_add_device(struct amdgpu_device *adev);
>>>>> void amdgpu_xgmi_remove_device(struct amdgpu_device *adev);
>>>>> -int amdgpu_xgmi_set_pstate(struct amdgpu_device *adev, int pstate);
>>>>> #endif
>> _______________________________________________
>> amd-gfx mailing list
>> amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
More information about the amd-gfx
mailing list