[PATCH v15 00/17] arm64: untag user pointers passed to the kernel
catalin.marinas at arm.com
Thu May 23 20:11:05 UTC 2019
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 11:51:40AM -0600, Khalid Aziz wrote:
> On 5/21/19 6:04 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> > As an aside: I think Sparc ADI support in Linux actually side-stepped
> > this (i.e. chose "solution 1"): "All addresses passed to kernel must
> > be non-ADI tagged addresses." (And sadly, "Kernel does not enable ADI
> > for kernel code.") I think this was a mistake we should not repeat for
> > arm64 (we do seem to be at least in agreement about this, I think).
> >  https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/654481/
> That is a very early version of the sparc ADI patch. Support for tagged
> addresses in syscalls was added in later versions and is in the patch
> that is in the kernel.
I tried to figure out but I'm not familiar with the sparc port. How did
you solve the tagged address going into various syscall implementations
in the kernel (e.g. sys_write)? Is the tag removed on kernel entry or it
ends up deeper in the core code?
More information about the amd-gfx