[PATCH] drm/amdgpu: fix ring test failure issue during s3 in vce 3.0
Christian König
ckoenig.leichtzumerken at gmail.com
Tue May 28 07:23:40 UTC 2019
Wow, really good catch!
The underlying problem is most likely that VCE block is either power or
clock gated and because of this the readptr read always returns zero.
Now amdgpu_ring_alloc() informs the power management code that the block
is about to be used and so the gating is turned off.
Mhm, that is probably wrong at a hole bunch of other places, at least
the UVD and VCN code comes to mind.
I agree with Leo that you should remove the original read (so to not
read twice) and it would be realy nice if you could double check the
other code (UVD/VCN) for similar problems as well.
Regards,
Christian.
Am 27.05.19 um 19:20 schrieb Li, Ching-shih (Louis):
>
> I don’t mean to read it twice. The solution is to make first read
> later. I didn’t modify the original code to make code difference less
> and simple. I guess it should work to remove the original read there.
>
> *From:*Liu, Leo <Leo.Liu at amd.com>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 28, 2019 12:40 AM
> *To:* Li, Ching-shih (Louis) <Ching-shih.Li at amd.com>; S, Shirish
> <Shirish.S at amd.com>; Grodzovsky, Andrey <Andrey.Grodzovsky at amd.com>;
> Zhang, Jerry <Jerry.Zhang at amd.com>; Deng, Emily <Emily.Deng at amd.com>;
> Deucher, Alexander <Alexander.Deucher at amd.com>
> *Cc:* amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> *Subject:* Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: fix ring test failure issue during
> s3 in vce 3.0
>
> int amdgpu_vce_ring_test_ring(struct amdgpu_ring *ring)
> {
> struct amdgpu_device *adev = ring->adev;
>
> uint32_t rptr = amdgpu_ring_get_rptr(ring);
>
> unsigned i;
> int r, timeout = adev->usec_timeout;
>
> /* skip ring test for sriov*/
> if (amdgpu_sriov_vf(adev))
> return 0;
>
> r = amdgpu_ring_alloc(ring, 16);
> if (r)
> return r;
>
> amdgpu_ring_write(ring, VCE_CMD_END);
> amdgpu_ring_commit(ring);
>
> Above is original code, rptr is updated when called, and below is your
> patch, my question is why do you need to get rptr twice?
>
> @@ -1084,6 +1084,8 @@ int amdgpu_vce_ring_test_ring(struct amdgpu_ring *ring)
> if (r)
> return r;
>
> + rptr = amdgpu_ring_get_rptr(ring);
> +
> amdgpu_ring_write(ring, VCE_CMD_END);
> amdgpu_ring_commit(ring);
>
>
> On 5/27/19 12:22 PM, Li, Ching-shih (Louis) wrote:
>
> Hi Leo,
>
> Yes, I confirm it is the root cause *for the Chrome S3 issue*.
> Whenever system is resumed, the original instruction always gets
> zero. However, I have no idea why it fails, and didn’t verify this
> problem on CRB or any other Linux platform yet.
>
> Although I think the ideal solution is an indicator, e.g. a
> register, for driver to check if related firmware and hardware are
> ready to work. So driver can make sure it is ok to read rptr.
> Without any reference document, I can only try to solve the
> problem by modifying driver. Debug traces reveal that only first
> rptr read fails, but the read in check loop is ok. Therefore, a
> solution comes to mind: to update rptr later for initial rptr
> value. Tests prove it working in Chrome platforms. Fyi~
>
> BR,
>
> Louis
>
> *From:*Liu, Leo <Leo.Liu at amd.com> <mailto:Leo.Liu at amd.com>
> *Sent:* Monday, May 27, 2019 9:01 PM
> *To:* S, Shirish <Shirish.S at amd.com> <mailto:Shirish.S at amd.com>;
> Grodzovsky, Andrey <Andrey.Grodzovsky at amd.com>
> <mailto:Andrey.Grodzovsky at amd.com>; Zhang, Jerry
> <Jerry.Zhang at amd.com> <mailto:Jerry.Zhang at amd.com>; Deng, Emily
> <Emily.Deng at amd.com> <mailto:Emily.Deng at amd.com>; Deucher,
> Alexander <Alexander.Deucher at amd.com>
> <mailto:Alexander.Deucher at amd.com>
> *Cc:* amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> <mailto:amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org>; Li, Ching-shih (Louis)
> <Ching-shih.Li at amd.com> <mailto:Ching-shih.Li at amd.com>
> *Subject:* Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: fix ring test failure issue
> during s3 in vce 3.0
>
> On 5/27/19 3:42 AM, S, Shirish wrote:
>
> From: Louis Li<Ching-shih.Li at amd.com> <mailto:Ching-shih.Li at amd.com>
>
>
>
> [What]
>
> vce ring test fails consistently during resume in s3 cycle, due to
>
> mismatch read & write pointers.
>
> On debug/analysis its found that rptr to be compared is not being
>
> correctly updated/read, which leads to this failure.
>
> Below is the failure signature:
>
> [drm:amdgpu_vce_ring_test_ring] *ERROR* amdgpu: ring 12 test failed
>
> [drm:amdgpu_device_ip_resume_phase2] *ERROR* resume of IP block <vce_v3_0> failed -110
>
> [drm:amdgpu_device_resume] *ERROR* amdgpu_device_ip_resume failed (-110).
>
>
>
> [How]
>
> fetch rptr appropriately, meaning move its read location further down
>
> in the code flow.
>
> With this patch applied the s3 failure is no more seen for >5k s3 cycles,
>
> which otherwise is pretty consistent.
>
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Louis Li<Ching-shih.Li at amd.com> <mailto:Ching-shih.Li at amd.com>
>
> ---
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vce.c | 2 ++
>
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vce.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vce.c
>
> index c021b11..92f9d46 100644
>
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vce.c
>
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vce.c
>
> @@ -1084,6 +1084,8 @@ int amdgpu_vce_ring_test_ring(struct amdgpu_ring *ring)
>
> if (r)
>
> return r;
>
>
>
> + rptr = amdgpu_ring_get_rptr(ring);
>
> +
>
> The rptr update is there:
>
> | uint32_t rptr = amdgpu_ring_get_rptr(ring);|
>
> ||
>
> |Are you sure this is the root cause?|
>
> ||
>
> |Regards,|
>
> |Leo|
>
> ||
>
>
>
> amdgpu_ring_write(ring, VCE_CMD_END);
>
> amdgpu_ring_commit(ring);
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> amd-gfx mailing list
> amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/amd-gfx/attachments/20190528/f16bafb5/attachment.html>
More information about the amd-gfx
mailing list