[PATCH v7 11/17] drm/dp_mst: Add DSC enablement helpers to DRM
Mikita Lipski
mlipski at amd.com
Tue Nov 26 15:32:42 UTC 2019
On 26/11/2019 10:24, Leo wrote:
>
>
> On 2019-11-16 5:01 p.m., mikita.lipski at amd.com wrote:
>> From: Mikita Lipski <mikita.lipski at amd.com>
>>
>> Adding a helper function to be called by
>> drivers outside of DRM to enable DSC on
>> the MST ports.
>>
>> Function is called to recalculate VCPI allocation
>> if DSC is enabled and raise the DSC flag to enable.
>> In case of disabling DSC the flag is set to false
>> and recalculation of VCPI slots is expected to be done
>> in encoder's atomic_check.
>>
>> v2: squash separate functions into one and call it per
>> port
>>
>> Cc: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland at amd.com>
>> Cc: Lyude Paul <lyude at redhat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Mikita Lipski <mikita.lipski at amd.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> include/drm/drm_dp_mst_helper.h | 5 +++
>> 2 files changed, 66 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
>> index 94bb259ab73e..98cc93d5ddd7 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
>> @@ -3876,6 +3876,67 @@ drm_dp_mst_atomic_check_topology_state(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> +/**
>> + * drm_dp_mst_atomic_enable_dsc - Set DSC Enable Flag to On/Off
>> + * @state: Pointer to the new drm_atomic_state
>> + * @pointer: Pointer to the affected MST Port
>
> s/@pointer/@port/
>
Thanks,
will update the comment.
>> + * @pbn: Newly recalculated bw required for link with DSC enabled
>> + * @pbn_div: Divider to calculate correct number of pbn per slot
>> + * @enable: Boolean flag enabling or disabling DSC on the port
>> + *
>> + * This function enables DSC on the given Port
>> + * by recalculating its vcpi from pbn provided
>> + * and sets dsc_enable flag to keep track of which
>> + * ports have DSC enabled
>
> Would be good to document the return value as well.
>
>> + *
>> + */
>> +int drm_dp_mst_atomic_enable_dsc(struct drm_atomic_state *state,
>> + struct drm_dp_mst_port *port,
>> + int pbn, int pbn_div,
>> + bool enable)
>> +{
>> + struct drm_dp_mst_topology_state *mst_state;
>> + struct drm_dp_vcpi_allocation *pos;
>> + bool found = false;
>> + int vcpi = 0;
>> +
>> + mst_state = drm_atomic_get_mst_topology_state(state, port->mgr);
>> +
>> + if (IS_ERR(mst_state))
>> + return PTR_ERR(mst_state);
>> +
>> + list_for_each_entry(pos, &mst_state->vcpis, next) {
>> + if (pos->port == port) {
>> + found = true;
>> + break;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (!found) {
>> + DRM_DEBUG_ATOMIC("[MST PORT:%p] Couldn't find VCPI allocation in mst state %p\n",
>> + port, mst_state);
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (pos->dsc_enabled == enable) {
>> + DRM_DEBUG_ATOMIC("[MST PORT:%p] DSC flag is already set to %d, returning %d VCPI slots\n",
>> + port, enable, pos->vcpi);
>> + vcpi = pos->vcpi;
>
> Do we want to early return here?
>
Not if a new compression rate is set.
The DSC could still be enabled, but the new device is introduced -
higher compression will be required, so PBN will change and we will have
to reassign the slots to the port.
> - Leo
>
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (enable) {
>> + vcpi = drm_dp_atomic_find_vcpi_slots(state, port->mgr, port, pbn, pbn_div);
>> + DRM_DEBUG_ATOMIC("[MST PORT:%p] Enabling DSC flag, reallocating %d VCPI slots on the port\n",
>> + port, vcpi);
>> + if (vcpi < 0)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + pos->dsc_enabled = enable;
>> +
>> + return vcpi;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_dp_mst_atomic_enable_dsc);
>> /**
>> * drm_dp_mst_atomic_check - Check that the new state of an MST topology in an
>> * atomic update is valid
>> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_dp_mst_helper.h b/include/drm/drm_dp_mst_helper.h
>> index fc19094b06c3..b1b00de3083b 100644
>> --- a/include/drm/drm_dp_mst_helper.h
>> +++ b/include/drm/drm_dp_mst_helper.h
>> @@ -431,6 +431,7 @@ struct drm_dp_payload {
>> struct drm_dp_vcpi_allocation {
>> struct drm_dp_mst_port *port;
>> int vcpi;
>> + bool dsc_enabled;
>> struct list_head next;
>> };
>>
>> @@ -663,6 +664,10 @@ drm_dp_atomic_find_vcpi_slots(struct drm_atomic_state *state,
>> struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
>> struct drm_dp_mst_port *port, int pbn,
>> int pbn_div);
>> +int drm_dp_mst_atomic_enable_dsc(struct drm_atomic_state *state,
>> + struct drm_dp_mst_port *port,
>> + int pbn, int pbn_div,
>> + bool enable);
>> int __must_check
>> drm_dp_atomic_release_vcpi_slots(struct drm_atomic_state *state,
>> struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
>>
> _______________________________________________
> amd-gfx mailing list
> amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.freedesktop.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Famd-gfx&data=02%7C01%7Cmikita.lipski%40amd.com%7C192110186aa94fd013bf08d77284c044%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637103786818615385&sdata=clMrVjoD6aPWzkVyxr%2FDEslGZmTrA2fx3vFp9ODKFu4%3D&reserved=0
>
--
Thanks,
Mikita Lipski
Software Engineer, AMD
mikita.lipski at amd.com
More information about the amd-gfx
mailing list