[PATCH hmm 03/15] mm/hmm: allow hmm_range to be used with a mmu_range_notifier or hmm_mirror
Jason Gunthorpe
jgg at ziepe.ca
Tue Oct 15 18:12:30 UTC 2019
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg at mellanox.com>
hmm_mirror's handling of ranges does not use a sequence count which
results in this bug:
CPU0 CPU1
hmm_range_wait_until_valid(range)
valid == true
hmm_range_fault(range)
hmm_invalidate_range_start()
range->valid = false
hmm_invalidate_range_end()
range->valid = true
hmm_range_valid(range)
valid == true
Where the hmm_range_valid should not have succeeded.
Adding the required sequence count would make it nearly identical to the
new mmu_range_notifier. Instead replace the hmm_mirror stuff with
mmu_range_notifier.
Co-existence of the two APIs is the first step.
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg at mellanox.com>
---
include/linux/hmm.h | 5 +++++
mm/hmm.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++------
2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/hmm.h b/include/linux/hmm.h
index 3fec513b9c00f1..8ac1fd6a81af8f 100644
--- a/include/linux/hmm.h
+++ b/include/linux/hmm.h
@@ -145,6 +145,9 @@ enum hmm_pfn_value_e {
/*
* struct hmm_range - track invalidation lock on virtual address range
*
+ * @notifier: an optional mmu_range_notifier
+ * @notifier_seq: when notifier is used this is the result of
+ * mmu_range_read_begin()
* @hmm: the core HMM structure this range is active against
* @vma: the vm area struct for the range
* @list: all range lock are on a list
@@ -159,6 +162,8 @@ enum hmm_pfn_value_e {
* @valid: pfns array did not change since it has been fill by an HMM function
*/
struct hmm_range {
+ struct mmu_range_notifier *notifier;
+ unsigned long notifier_seq;
struct hmm *hmm;
struct list_head list;
unsigned long start;
diff --git a/mm/hmm.c b/mm/hmm.c
index 902f5fa6bf93ad..22ac3595771feb 100644
--- a/mm/hmm.c
+++ b/mm/hmm.c
@@ -852,6 +852,14 @@ void hmm_range_unregister(struct hmm_range *range)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(hmm_range_unregister);
+static bool needs_retry(struct hmm_range *range)
+{
+ if (range->notifier)
+ return mmu_range_check_retry(range->notifier,
+ range->notifier_seq);
+ return !range->valid;
+}
+
static const struct mm_walk_ops hmm_walk_ops = {
.pud_entry = hmm_vma_walk_pud,
.pmd_entry = hmm_vma_walk_pmd,
@@ -892,18 +900,23 @@ long hmm_range_fault(struct hmm_range *range, unsigned int flags)
const unsigned long device_vma = VM_IO | VM_PFNMAP | VM_MIXEDMAP;
unsigned long start = range->start, end;
struct hmm_vma_walk hmm_vma_walk;
- struct hmm *hmm = range->hmm;
+ struct mm_struct *mm;
struct vm_area_struct *vma;
int ret;
- lockdep_assert_held(&hmm->mmu_notifier.mm->mmap_sem);
+ if (range->notifier)
+ mm = range->notifier->mm;
+ else
+ mm = range->hmm->mmu_notifier.mm;
+
+ lockdep_assert_held(&mm->mmap_sem);
do {
/* If range is no longer valid force retry. */
- if (!range->valid)
+ if (needs_retry(range))
return -EBUSY;
- vma = find_vma(hmm->mmu_notifier.mm, start);
+ vma = find_vma(mm, start);
if (vma == NULL || (vma->vm_flags & device_vma))
return -EFAULT;
@@ -933,7 +946,7 @@ long hmm_range_fault(struct hmm_range *range, unsigned int flags)
start = hmm_vma_walk.last;
/* Keep trying while the range is valid. */
- } while (ret == -EBUSY && range->valid);
+ } while (ret == -EBUSY && !needs_retry(range));
if (ret) {
unsigned long i;
@@ -991,7 +1004,7 @@ long hmm_range_dma_map(struct hmm_range *range, struct device *device,
continue;
/* Check if range is being invalidated */
- if (!range->valid) {
+ if (needs_retry(range)) {
ret = -EBUSY;
goto unmap;
}
--
2.23.0
More information about the amd-gfx
mailing list