[PATCH hmm 15/15] mm/hmm: remove hmm_mirror and related
Jerome Glisse
jglisse at redhat.com
Mon Oct 21 19:19:22 UTC 2019
On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 06:57:42PM +0000, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 02:38:24PM -0400, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 03:12:42PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg at mellanox.com>
> > >
> > > The only two users of this are now converted to use mmu_range_notifier,
> > > delete all the code and update hmm.rst.
> >
> > I guess i should point out that the reasons for hmm_mirror and hmm
> > was for:
> > 1) Maybe define a common API for userspace to provide memory
> > placement hints (NUMA for GPU)
>
> Do you think this needs special code in the notifiers?
Just need a place where to hang userspace policy hint the hmm_range
was the prime suspect. I need to revisit this once the nouveau user
space is in better shape.
>
> > 2) multi-devices sharing same mirror page table
>
> Oh neat, but I think this just means the GPU driver has to register a
> single notifier for multiple GPUs??
Yes that was the idea a single notifier with share page table, but
at this time this is non existent code so no need to hinder change
just for the sake of it.
>
> > But support for multi-GPU in nouveau is way behind and i guess such
> > optimization will have to re-materialize what is necessary once that
> > happens.
>
> Sure, it will be easier to understand what is needed with a bit of
> code!
>
> > Note this patch should also update kernel/fork.c and the mm_struct
> > definition AFAICT. With those changes you can add my:
>
> Can you please elaborate what updates you mean? I'm not sure.
>
> Maybe I already got the things you are thinking of with the get/put
> changes?
Oh i forgot this was already taken care of by this. So yes all is
fine:
Reviewed-by: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse at redhat.com>
More information about the amd-gfx
mailing list