[PATCH] drm/radeon: Bail earlier when radeon.cik_/si_support=0 is passed

Michel Dänzer michel at daenzer.net
Wed Sep 11 09:04:34 UTC 2019


On 2019-09-10 11:36 a.m., Hans de Goede wrote:
> On 9/10/19 9:50 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>> On 2019-09-07 10:32 p.m., Hans de Goede wrote:
>>> Bail from the pci_driver probe function instead of from the drm_driver
>>> load function.
>>>
>>> This avoid /dev/dri/card0 temporarily getting registered and then
>>> unregistered again, sending unwanted add / remove udev events to
>>> userspace.
>>>
>>> Specifically this avoids triggering the (userspace) bug fixed by this
>>> plymouth merge-request:
>>> https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/plymouth/plymouth/merge_requests/59
>>>
>>> Note that despite that being an userspace bug, not sending unnecessary
>>> udev events is a good idea in general.
>>>
>>> BugLink: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1490490
>>> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com>
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Michel Dänzer <mdaenzer at redhat.com>
> 
> Thank you for the review. I've drm push rights, but I guess that radeon/amd
> GPU patches are collected by someone @AMD, so I do not need to / should not
> push this myself, right?

I think so, unless one of the driver maintainers says otherwise.


>> amdgpu should be changed correspondingly as well.
> 
> Good point. I'm currently travelling (@plumbers) I can do this when I'm
> back home,
> but feel free to beat me to it (if you do please Cc me to avoid double
> work).

I'm happy to leave it to you, if you don't mind.


-- 
Earthling Michel Dänzer               |               https://redhat.com
Libre software enthusiast             |             Mesa and X developer


More information about the amd-gfx mailing list