[PATCH] drm/amdkfd: Delete unused KFD_IS_DGPU macro
Kuehling, Felix
Felix.Kuehling at amd.com
Mon Sep 16 17:41:15 UTC 2019
On 2019-09-16 12:26 p.m., wrote:
> This was deleted before, but somehow showed up again. Delete it again.
>
> Change-Id: I19b3063932380cb74a01d505e8e92f897a2c2cb7
> Signed-off-by: Yong Zhao <Yong.Zhao at amd.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_priv.h | 3 ---
> 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_priv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_priv.h
> index 06bb2d7a9b39..6ed31a76dfda 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_priv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_priv.h
> @@ -180,9 +180,6 @@ enum cache_policy {
> };
>
> #define KFD_IS_VI(chip) ((chip) >= CHIP_CARRIZO && (chip) <= CHIP_POLARIS11)
> -#define KFD_IS_DGPU(chip) (((chip) >= CHIP_TONGA && \
> - (chip) <= CHIP_NAVI10) || \
> - (chip) == CHIP_HAWAII)
Are you familiar with "git blame"? It's really useful to track down
which commit introduced code. In this case it shows that both IS_DGPU
and IS_VI were added back by Philip Cox in his Navi10 change, probably
accidentally while resolving a rebase conflict. You can probably remove
IS_VI as well.
Regards,
Felix
> #define KFD_IS_SOC15(chip) ((chip) >= CHIP_VEGA10)
>
> struct kfd_event_interrupt_class {
More information about the amd-gfx
mailing list