[PATCH 2/2] drm/amdgpu: remove redundant variable definition

[Chen, Guchun]

No need to define the same variables in each loop of the function.

Change-Id: Id8bbcc5a2ac87e9d31a72244345fde2d6bb99d42
Signed-off-by: Guchun Chen <guchun.chen at amd.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras_eeprom.c | 15 ++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras_eeprom.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras_eeprom.c
index d0e020ef73e3..20af0a17d00b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras_eeprom.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras_eeprom.c
@@ -359,8 +359,9 @@ int amdgpu_ras_eeprom_process_recods(struct amdgpu_ras_eeprom_control *control,
 					    int num)
 {
 	int i, ret = 0;
-	struct i2c_msg *msgs;
-	unsigned char *buffs;
+	struct i2c_msg *msgs, *msg;
+	unsigned char *buffs, *buff;
+	struct eeprom_table_record *record;
 	struct amdgpu_device *adev = to_amdgpu_device(control);
 
 	if (adev->asic_type != CHIP_VEGA20)
@@ -390,9 +391,9 @@ int amdgpu_ras_eeprom_process_recods(struct amdgpu_ras_eeprom_control *control,
 	 * 256b
 	 */
 	for (i = 0; i < num; i++) {
-		unsigned char *buff = &buffs[i * (EEPROM_ADDRESS_SIZE + EEPROM_TABLE_RECORD_SIZE)];
-		struct eeprom_table_record *record = &records[i];
-		struct i2c_msg *msg = &msgs[i];
+		buff = &buffs[i * (EEPROM_ADDRESS_SIZE + EEPROM_TABLE_RECORD_SIZE)];
+		record = &records[i];
+		msg = &msgs[i];
 
 		control->next_addr = __correct_eeprom_dest_address(control->next_addr);
 
@@ -432,8 +433,8 @@ int amdgpu_ras_eeprom_process_recods(struct amdgpu_ras_eeprom_control *control,
 
 	if (!write) {
 		for (i = 0; i < num; i++) {
-			unsigned char *buff = &buffs[i*(EEPROM_ADDRESS_SIZE + EEPROM_TABLE_RECORD_SIZE)];
-			struct eeprom_table_record *record = &records[i];
+			buff = &buffs[i*(EEPROM_ADDRESS_SIZE + EEPROM_TABLE_RECORD_SIZE)];
+			record = &records[i];
 
 			__decode_table_record_from_buff(control, record, buff + EEPROM_ADDRESS_SIZE);
 		}
-- 
2.17.1