[PATCH 3/6] drm/amdgpu/vm: fix up documentation in amdgpu_vm.c
Christian König
ckoenig.leichtzumerken at gmail.com
Fri Sep 20 14:24:59 UTC 2019
Am 19.09.19 um 23:45 schrieb Alex Deucher:
> Missing parameters, wrong comment type, etc.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher at amd.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c | 17 ++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c
> index 2bb53191f655..a2c797e34a29 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c
> @@ -342,7 +342,7 @@ static struct amdgpu_vm_pt *amdgpu_vm_pt_parent(struct amdgpu_vm_pt *pt)
> return container_of(parent->vm_bo, struct amdgpu_vm_pt, base);
> }
>
> -/**
> +/*
Hui? That doesn't look correct to me, why shouldn't this be a
documentation comment?
Christian.
> * amdgpu_vm_pt_cursor - state for for_each_amdgpu_vm_pt
> */
> struct amdgpu_vm_pt_cursor {
> @@ -483,6 +483,7 @@ static void amdgpu_vm_pt_next(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
> *
> * @adev: amdgpu_device structure
> * @vm: amdgpu_vm structure
> + * @start: optional cursor to start with
> * @cursor: state to initialize
> *
> * Starts a deep first traversal of the PD/PT tree.
> @@ -536,7 +537,7 @@ static void amdgpu_vm_pt_next_dfs(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
> amdgpu_vm_pt_ancestor(cursor);
> }
>
> -/**
> +/*
> * for_each_amdgpu_vm_pt_dfs_safe - safe deep first search of all PDs/PTs
> */
> #define for_each_amdgpu_vm_pt_dfs_safe(adev, vm, start, cursor, entry) \
> @@ -857,6 +858,7 @@ static void amdgpu_vm_bo_param(struct amdgpu_device *adev, struct amdgpu_vm *vm,
> * @adev: amdgpu_device pointer
> * @vm: VM to allocate page tables for
> * @cursor: Which page table to allocate
> + * @direct: use a direct update
> *
> * Make sure a specific page table or directory is allocated.
> *
> @@ -1196,10 +1198,10 @@ uint64_t amdgpu_vm_map_gart(const dma_addr_t *pages_addr, uint64_t addr)
> return result;
> }
>
> -/*
> +/**
> * amdgpu_vm_update_pde - update a single level in the hierarchy
> *
> - * @param: parameters for the update
> + * @params: parameters for the update
> * @vm: requested vm
> * @entry: entry to update
> *
> @@ -1223,7 +1225,7 @@ static int amdgpu_vm_update_pde(struct amdgpu_vm_update_params *params,
> return vm->update_funcs->update(params, bo, pde, pt, 1, 0, flags);
> }
>
> -/*
> +/**
> * amdgpu_vm_invalidate_pds - mark all PDs as invalid
> *
> * @adev: amdgpu_device pointer
> @@ -1242,7 +1244,7 @@ static void amdgpu_vm_invalidate_pds(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
> amdgpu_vm_bo_relocated(&entry->base);
> }
>
> -/*
> +/**
> * amdgpu_vm_update_pdes - make sure that all directories are valid
> *
> * @adev: amdgpu_device pointer
> @@ -1294,7 +1296,7 @@ int amdgpu_vm_update_pdes(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
> return r;
> }
>
> -/**
> +/*
> * amdgpu_vm_update_flags - figure out flags for PTE updates
> *
> * Make sure to set the right flags for the PTEs at the desired level.
> @@ -2815,6 +2817,7 @@ static int amdgpu_vm_check_clean_reserved(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
> *
> * @adev: amdgpu_device pointer
> * @vm: requested vm
> + * @pasid: pasid to use
> *
> * This only works on GFX VMs that don't have any BOs added and no
> * page tables allocated yet.
More information about the amd-gfx
mailing list